SIDDHARTH
Keshav Pd. – Appellant
Versus
D. D. C. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SIDDHARTH, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for quashing the judgment and order dated 25.09.1972 of Assistant Settlement Officer Consolidation, Basti, in Appeal Nos. 71 to 74 and judgment and order dated 23.06.1976 passed by Deputy Director of Consolidation, Basti, in revision nos. 47 to 50.
2. This writ petition arises out of the objections under Section 9-A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation Act, 1953 (for short, the Act). These objections are a total of six. The land in dispute comprises of Gata nos. 12, 14, 115, 70, 196, 11 and 111, all situate in Village Taraina, Pargana Bansi East, District Basti. Of these, three separate objections were filed by Ram Lagan, Ram Lal and Vijay Bahadur, all sons of Chulhai, respondents nos. 3, 4 and 5, respectively, to this petition. All the three objections last mentioned were filed on a common and identical cause of action and for the same relief, that is to say, that revenue entries relating to Gata nos. 12, 14 and 115 (supra) be corrected according to the compromise decree, dated 23.11.1959 passed by the Judicial Officer, Bansi, District Basti in Suit No. 270 of 1959, under Sect
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.