IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, JJ.
Geetanjali Tiwari (Pandey) – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and Others – Respondents
Writ (A) No. 580 of 2023, Special Appeal Defective Nos. 187, 257 of 2022, Civil Misc. Review Application No. 398 of 2023
Decided On : 18-01-2024
Teaching Experience - UGC Regulations - 4.1 - 10.0 - The court addressed the applicability of regulation 10(f)(iii) in awarding marks for teaching/post-doctoral experience for shortlisting candidates for the post of Assistant Professors. It held that regulation 10(f)(iii) is not applicable for shortlisting candidates and that teaching experience as a full-time teacher with requisite qualifications should entitle a candidate to marks for shortlisting.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, who possess the minimum qualifications for the post of Assistant Professor, were aggrieved by their non-inclusion in the short-listed candidates for interview. They challenged the application of regulation 10(f)(iii) in awarding marks for teaching experience, as it affected their eligibility for shortlisting.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that regulation 10(f)(iii) was not applicable for shortlisting candidates for the post of Assistant Professors and that teaching experience as a full-time teacher with requisite qualifications should entitle a candidate to marks for shortlisting.
Issues: The main issue was the applicability of regulation 10(f)(iii) in awarding marks for teaching/post-doctoral experience for shortlisting candidates for the post of Assistant Professors.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that regulation 10(f)(iii) is not applicable for shortlisting candidates and that teaching experience as a full-time teacher with requisite qualifications should entitle a candidate to marks for shortlisting.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition, special appeal, and review application, directing the respondents to shortlist candidates for the post of Assistant Professor in accordance with the court's interpretation of clause 7 of table 3A.
JUDGMENT :
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J.
1. These bunch of cases raise similar questions of law and fact and have been heard together. They are thus being disposed of by this common judgment. Writ Petition No. 580 of 2023 filed by Geetanjali Tiwari (Pandey) is taken as the lead case.
2. All the petitioners/appellants in this bunch undisputedly possess minimum qualification prescribed for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor in a recognized university or the degree colleges affiliated to it. The qualification for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor is prescribed by the UGC regulations notified on 18.7.2018, titled as University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and other Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) Regulations, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Regulations’). The post of Assistant Professor as per the regulations is to be filled by way of direct recruitment. Clause 4 of the regulations, in so far as it deals with appointment on the post of Assistant Professor, is extracted hereinafter:
4.1 For the Disciplines of Arts, Commerce, Humanities, Education, Law, Social Science, Sciences, Languages, Library Science, Physical Education, and Journalism and Mass Communication.
(I) Assistant Professor:
Eligibility (A or B):
(A)
(i) A Master’s degree with 55% marks (or an equivalent grade in a point-scale wherever the grading system is followed) in a concerned/relevant/allied subject from an Indian University, or an equivalent degree from an accredited foreign university.
(ii) Besides fulfilling the above qualifications, the candidate must have cleared the National Eligibility Test (NET) conducted by the UGC or the CSIR, or a similar test accredited by the UGC, like SLET/SET or who are or have been awarded a Ph.D. Degree in accordance with the University Grants Commission (Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of M.Phil./Ph.D. Degree) Regulations, 2009 or 2016 and their amendments from time to time as the case may be exempted from NET/SLET/SET:
Provided, the candidates registered for the Ph.D. programme prior to July 11, 2009, shall be governed by the provisions of the then existing Ordinances/Bye-laws/Regulations of the Institution awarding the degree and such Ph.D. candidates shall be exempted from the requirement of NET/SLET/SET for recruitment and appointment of Assistant Professor or equivalent positions in Universities/Colleges/Institutions subject to the fulfillment of the following conditions:
(a) The Ph.D. degree of the candidate has been awarded in a regular mode.
(b) The Ph.D. thesis has been evaluated by at least two external examiners.
(c) An open Ph.D. viva voce of the candidate has been conducted.
(d) The candidate has published two research papers from his/her Ph.D. work, out of which at least one is in a referred journal.
(e) The candidate has presented at least two papers based on his/her Ph.D. work in conferences/seminars sponsored/funded/supported by the UGC/ICSSR/CSIR or any similar agency.
The fulfilment of these conditions is to be certified by the Registrar or the Dean (Academic Affairs) of the University concerned.
Note: NET/SLET/SET shall also not be required for such Masters Programmes in disciplines for which NET/SLET/SET is not conducted by the UGC, CSIR or similar test accredited by the UGC, like SLET/SET.
OR
(B) The Ph.D. degree has been obtained from a foreign university/institution with a ranking among top 500 in the World University Ranking (at any time) by any one of the following: (i) Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) (ii) the Times Higher Education (THE) or (iii) the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) of the Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Shanghai).
Note: The Academic score as specified in Appendix II (Table 3A) for Universities, and Appendix II (T
The main legal point established in the judgment is that regulation 10(f)(iii) is not applicable for shortlisting candidates for the post of Assistant Professors, and teaching experience as a full-ti....
Regulation 10(f)(iii) of the 2018 Regulations applies to Assistant Professors, requiring prior teaching experience to be counted for shortlisting candidates.
Point of Law : Central government had no authority to disagree with the recommendation of UGC.
While making appointments, Universities are bound by stipulations of UGC Regulations and cannot travel beyond it, even if respective State Legislations or Regulations are to speak to contrary.
The court affirmed the validity of the selection process for Assistant Professors and clarified that guest lecturer experience can't always be excluded for direct recruitment under regulatory guideli....
Teaching experience marks for Assistant Professor shortlisting invalid if claimed prior to essential qualifications (NET/SET/M.Phil/Ph.D) or based on unverified/dubious certificates; erroneous shortl....
Teaching experience claimed during Ph.D. studies is not valid unless it was active service without leave, impacting selection criteria for academic appointments.
Rule 10 (ab) of Part II KS & SSR had to be read along with Special Rules that prescribed qualifications for post of Professor and when so read, qualifying teaching experience for post had to be seen ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.