IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, SYED AFTAB HUSAIN RIZVI, JJ.
Km. Gulrooh Tarannum @ Raxi – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 2951 of 2013
Decided on : 13-12-2023
Criminal Law - Murder - Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 302, 304, 420, 467, 468, 471 - The court analyzed the evidence and concluded that the accused appellant was acquitted of the charges due to insufficient evidence and failure to establish the chain of events pointing exclusively to the guilt attributed to the accused appellant.
Fact of the Case:
The deceased couple, Hasan Aziz Farooqi and Rana Aziz Farooqi, were found dead in their home. The accused appellant was living in a different portion of the same house. The prosecution alleged that the accused appellant withdrew large sums of money from the joint account of the deceased couple and administered poison to them, causing their deaths.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused appellant beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted inconsistencies in the evidence, including the recovery of a mobile phone from the accused appellant and the utilization of cheque leaflets for unauthorized withdrawals. The court also raised concerns about the role of bank officials and the absence of conclusive evidence linking the accused appellant to the crimes.
Issues: The main issues revolved around the sufficiency of evidence to prove the guilt of the accused appellant, including the recovery of the mobile phone, the accused appellant's change of residence, and the utilization of cheque leaflets for unauthorized withdrawals.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles of circumstantial evidence and emphasized the need for the prosecution to establish a complete chain of events pointing exclusively to the guilt of the accused appellant. The court highlighted inconsistencies in the evidence and the failure to exclude other hypotheses of innocence.
Final Decision: The court reversed the conviction and sentence of the accused appellant, acquitting her of all charges. The court also discharged her sureties and bail bonds, setting her free.
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal is by the accused appellant against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence, dated 01.06.2013, passed by the Additional Session Judge, Court No.2, Aligarh in Session Trial No.951 of 2008, State vs. Km. Gulrooh Tarannum @ Raxi (arising out of Case Crime No.633 of 2007) Police Station Civil Line, District Aligarh, whereby the accused appellant has been convicted under section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment with fine of Rs.50,000/-and in default of fine she is to undergo six months additional simple imprisonment, separately, for committing murder of two deceased Hasan Aziz Farooqi and Rana Aziz Farooqi; under section 304 IPC for two years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000/ and in default of fine she is to undergo one month additional simple imprisonment; under section 420 IPC for three years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/-and in default of fine she is to undergo three months additional simple imprisonment; under section 467 IPC for five years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.20,000/-and in default of fine she is to undergo six months additional simple imprisonment; under section 468 IPC for three years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/-and in default of fine she is to undergo three months additional simple imprisonment; under section 471 IPC for one year rigorous imprisonment. All the sentences are to run concurrently.
2. Hasan Aziz Farooqi was employed in Aligarh Muslim University and retired from the post of Section Officer. His wife Smt. Rana Aziz Farooqi was a teacher in Aligarh Public School. After her retirement both Hasan Aziz Farooqi and Smt. Rana Azia Farooqi were living at House No.3/18, United Colony, Amir Nisha, Police Station Civil Lines, Aligarh. As per the informant (PW-1), Hasan Aziz Farooqi and Smt. Rana Aziz Farooqi were to reach Lucknow on 23.11.2007 but they did not reach. Their nephew Rehaw Farooqi, who was residing at Lucknow, called the informant to go and verify. Accordingly, the informant came to the house of Hasan Aziz Farooqi and found the door to be locked from outside. He smelled stench coming out of the house and contacted the owner Fazal Abbas (PW-2). The house was searched from all sides and with the help of neighbours the lock was broke open. It was found that dead body of Smt. Farooqi was lying on double bed whereas dead body of Hasan Aziz Farooqi was lying on the floor. It appeared that the death has occurred several days back. The informant suspected that some unknown person killed the elderly couple and locked the house. A written report (Ex.Ka.1) in that regard has been given by the informant to the Incharge, Police Station Civil Lines, Aligarh. Contents of the written report were transcribed in the general diary and First Information Report was lodged as Case Crime No.633 of 2007, under Section 302 IPC, Police Station Civil Lines, District Aligarh on 24.11.2007 at 11.30 am.
3. According to the prosecution case, the accused appellant was living in a different portion of the same house where deceased couple was also residing. After dead body of elderly couple was found the police contacted the accused appellant and she was arrested on 26.11.2007. According to the police, one Nokia mobile phone belonging to the accused herself and one mobile phone belonging to deceased couple was recovered from the accused appellant. Recovery is said to have been witnessed by PW-1. During the course of investigation it was found that the deceased couple had opened a joint saving bank account in the Bank of Baroda, Branch Malkhan Nagar, Aligarh bearing account no.2161010000716 on 31st August, 2007. It was found that deposits made in the joint account of deceased couple had been withdrawn vide five cheques bearing cheque no.760722 dated 18.10.2007 for a sum of Rs.2,10,000/-; cheque no.760727 dated 22.10.2007 for a sum of Rs.25,000/-; cheque no.760737 dated 23.10.2007 for a sum of Rs.1,34,000/-; cheque no.760730 dated 13.11.2007
Sharad Birdichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra (1973) 2 SCC 793
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, especially in cases based on circumstantial evidence....
The prosecution must establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt for a conviction; mere suspicion is insufficient.
Circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt; conviction upheld due to strong incriminating circumstances.
Circumstantial evidence must provide a complete and unbroken chain conclusively establishing the accused's guilt; gaps in evidence require acquittal.
The duty of the Appellate Court to independently assess the evidence and establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt based on complete and reliable circumstantial evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.