Devendra Kumar vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 1621

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 1621

SALIL KUMAR RAI, SURENDRA SINGH-I
Devendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mohd. Farooq.

JUDGMENT :

Surendra Singh-I, J.

Heard Mohd. Farooq, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State.

2. The prosecution case against the petitioner, Devendra Kumar, and his son, Prashant Vishnoi in brief is that on receiving the information regarding illegal storage of large quantity of hide, trophies made of skulls and horn of prohibited forest animals including their meat kept in 47 packets on 29.04.2017 at 01:30 p.m., a joint team of officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and Forest Department, Meerut Division, Meerut, raided the residence of the petitioner, Devendra Kumar, and his son, Prashant Vishnoi situated at 36/4, Civil Lines, Meerut. From the room situated at second floor of the house, hide of leopard, hide and skull of black deer, horns of sambar and deer in large quantity and a knife with handle made of tusk, was recovered. On the ground floor, meat of prohibited wild animals kept in 47 packets in freeze container (deep freezer) was also recovered. Details of articles recovered is as follows :-

(i) one hide of leopard

(ii) one hide of deer/antelope

(iii) one skull of large antelope

(iv) 3 horns of young large antelope

(v) 9 deer