Praveen Pal VS State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SAMIT GOPAL
Praveen Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant : Ravi Kumar Singh, Mohit Singh

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Ravi Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State and perused the records.

2. Personal affidavit of Sri Ashok Kumar, Deputy Director, Forensic Science Laboratory, U.P., Agra has been filed today which is taken on record. He is present in Court in compliance of the order dated 6.4.2022 of this Court.

3. Personal affidavit of Sri Badugu Deva Paulson, Secretary (Home), Government of U.P., Lucknow has also been filed today which is taken on record.

4. Personal affidavit of Sri Mukul Goel, Director General of Police, U.P., Lucknow has also been filed today which is taken on record.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the present bail application has rendered infructuous as the trial has concluded and the applicant has been convicted, as such the same may be dismissed as not pressed.

6. Although a prayer has been made to dismiss the bail application as not pressed but since compliance affidavits have been filed by the concerned officials as stated above in compliance of the order dated 6.4.2022 of this Court, it would be necessary to refer to them as the said matter is in the larger interest of jus