IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Samit Gopal, J.
Praveen Pal – Applicant
Versus
State of U.P. – Opposite Party
Criminal Misc. Bail application No. - 33746 of 2020
Decided On : 29-04-2022
Bail Application - Delay in Trial - Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4779 of 2020, Prevention of Corruption Act - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the delay in the trial and the non-receipt of the report of the Forensic Lab, emphasizing the importance of timely examination of evidence by the Forensic Lab in criminal cases. The court also highlighted the need for expeditious examination of samples by the Forensic Science Laboratory and the steps being taken by the government to address the delay.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant's bail application was rendered infructuous as the trial concluded and the applicant was convicted. The delay in the trial was attributed to the non-receipt of the report of the Forensic Lab, which was deemed alarming by the court.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the delay in the trial was primarily due to the non-receipt of the report of the Forensic Lab, and emphasized the importance of timely examination of evidence by the Forensic Lab in criminal cases.
Issues: Delay in trial due to non-receipt of Forensic Lab report
Ratio Decidendi: The delay in the trial was attributed to the non-receipt of the report of the Forensic Lab, and the court highlighted the need for expeditious examination of samples by the Forensic Science Laboratory.
Final Decision: The bail application was consigned to records.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Ravi Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State and perused the records.
2. Personal affidavit of Sri Ashok Kumar, Deputy Director, Forensic Science Laboratory, U.P., Agra has been filed today which is taken on record. He is present in Court in compliance of the order dated 6.4.2022 of this Court.
3. Personal affidavit of Sri Badugu Deva Paulson, Secretary (Home), Government of U.P., Lucknow has also been filed today which is taken on record.
4. Personal affidavit of Sri Mukul Goel, Director General of Police, U.P., Lucknow has also been filed today which is taken on record.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the present bail application has rendered infructuous as the trial has concluded and the applicant has been convicted, as such the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
6. Although a prayer has been made to dismiss the bail application as not pressed but since compliance affidavits have been filed by the concerned officials as stated above in compliance of the order dated 6.4.2022 of this Court, it would be necessary to refer to them as the said matter is in the larger interest of justice before closing the issue.
7. On 6.4.2022, following order was passed by this Court:-
"Heard Sri Ravi Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State.
This is the second bail application on behalf of the applicant. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 6.2.2020 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4779 of 2020. While rejecting the said bail application, this Court had expedited the trial and directed to conclude the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six months from the date of production of certified copy of the same. The said order was filed before the trial court on 3.3.2020.
Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is in jail since 23.04.2018 and the trial has not concluded. This Court vide order dated 27.10.2021 directed the District Judge, Meerut to send the report regarding the stage of trial and compliance of the order dated 06.02.2020 passed by this Court. The order passed on 27.10.2021 is quoted here-in-below:-
"Heard Sri Ravi Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Akhilesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the State.
This is the second bail application on behalf of the applicant. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 6.2.2020 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4779 of 2020.
Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the order rejecting the first bail of the applicant was filed before the trial court on 3.3.2020 and even then the trial is pending and has not yet concluded. He has placed the certified copy of the order sheet which is annexed as annexure no.23 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. The applicant is in jail since 23.04.2018.
Looking to the arguments of the learned counsel for the applicant, let a report from the District Judge, Meerut be called within three weeks from today regarding the stage of trial and compliance of the order dated 06.02.2020 passed by this Court.
The office to communicate this order to the concerned District Judge within a week from today.
Let the matter be listed in the week commencing 22.11.2021 along with report received from the District Judge, Meerut."
The report of the In-Charge Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Special Court No.2 (Prevention of Corruption Act), Meerut dated 17.11.2021 is on record.
A perusal of the said report shows that the statement of P.W.1 Phool Chand Singh was recorded on 4.9.2019, statement of P.W.2 Umesh Chand was recorded on 15.11.2019, statement of P.W.3 and 4 Monu and Devendra Saini was recorded on 18.2.2020. Subsequently the certified copy of the order dated 6.2.2020 was filed before the trial court on 5.3.2020, after it, state
AI
The importance of timely examination of evidence by the Forensic Lab in criminal cases.
The right to a speedy and fair trial is integral to Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and the court emphasized the importance of timely dispensation of justice.
The court ruled that the absence of ballistic evidence linking the firearm to the crime necessitates the granting of bail, emphasizing the critical role of timely forensic reporting in criminal justi....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of DNA verification in rape cases, especially those involving minors, as highlighted in the provisions of section 53-A of the Cri....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that failure to complete investigations within the stipulated period entitles the accused to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C.
Trial vitiated if chemical/DNA reports relied upon without summoning experts for cross-examination; court must summon as witnesses, remand limited for that purpose with fresh Section 313 statements, ....
(1) Statutory bail – Accused under NDPS Act are also entitled to be informed of their such right by Special Judge – If charge-sheet is filed within statutory period of 180 days or within extended per....
The non-filing of FSL report with the challan does not vitiate the challan or entitle the applicant to default bail under section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Narcotic Substances - Bail rejected - Petitioner has been found in possession of contraband of commercial quantity - Court is unable to record a finding that there are reasonable grounds for believin....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.