SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA
Bakar Ali Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Arvind Srivastava III
For the Respondent: Brijesh Kumar Yadav

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondents, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

2. Present petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 6.10.2022 passed by the Additional Session Judge (Fast Track Court-II), Rampur in Criminal Revision No.78 of 2022 as well as the order dated 28.2.2022 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rampur in Case No.23 of 2022, under Section 145 of Cr.P.C. Vide order dated 6.10.2022, the order dated 28.2.2022, passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rampur has been affirmed and the criminal revision filed by the present petitioners has been dismissed.

3. The factual matrix of the case relevant for the purpose of present petition are that the proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. began before the Court of Up Zila Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, Rampur on report of Tehsildar Sadar dated 3.1.2022, in which it was informed that a fact finding inquiry was conducted regarding Khatauni/Khata No.10 and 11 situated at Village Madaiyan Nadar Bagh, Tehsil Sadar. According to the order of then S.D.M. Dated 4.3.1975, the land measuring

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top