SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 1854

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH
Shahid Husain – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Jai Singh Yadav
For the Respondent: Arun Kumar Srivastava

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Jai Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. Present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 16.03.2018 passed by the Licensing Authority whereby the fair price shop agreement in favour of the petitioner has been cancelled. Further, challenge has been raised to the order dated 23.09.2019 passed by the Appeal Authority who has confirmed the order dated 16.03.2018.

3. Submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner are that cancellation order has been passed, amongst others on grounds that had not even been mentioned in the charge sheet. To that extent, the cancellation order is passed on extraneous consideration. Second, it has been submitted, the entire proceedings have arisen on unverified facts. The complaint was not supported by personal affidavit of any of the complainants. Amongst others, it included names of dead persons such as Salim S/o Sirajuddin, Jagat Pal S/o Lal Sahai, Vimla Devi W/o Mahipal, Champa Devi W/o Ram Lal and Prem Kali W/o Chandra Pal. The preliminary enquiry was conduced behind the back of the petitioner.

4. In any case, upon receipt of charge sheet,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top