Neelam Mishra VS State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Neelam Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Anurag Tripathi, Anand Mani Tripathi.

JUDGMENT :

DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J.

1. Heard Sri Anand Mani Tripathi assisted by Sri Anurag Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Virendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State.

2. Present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking following reliefs:

“(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the order dated 13.10.2022 passed by the opposite party No. 2 as contained in annexure no. 1 to the writ petition.

(ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding/directing the opposite parties to reconsider the case of the petitioner for appointment under The Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servant Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 on a suitable post according to her qualification in the department forthwith.

(iii)....

(iv)....”

3. This is second writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking appointment on compassionate ground after the death of her father-in-law on 02.06.2018, who was serving as Head Constable in U.P. Civil Police and died in harness.

4. Earlier, the petitioner filed a writ petition being Writ Appeal No. 8279 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document