Kiran Singh VS State Of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Kiran Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Diwakar Singh, Alka Singh, Anand Kumar Kaushal, Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Nadeem Murtaza, Vimal Kishor Singh.
For the Opposite Parties : G.A., Ashish Kumar Mishra, Pramod Kumar Shukla, Vijay Prakash Mishra.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Nadeem Murtaza, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri S.P. Tiwari, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. No one has appeared on behalf of the complainant nor any adjournment slip has been moved.

2. As per learned counsel for the applicant, the present applicant is apprehending her arrest in FIR No. 111 of 2021, under Section 306 IPC, Police Station Cantt, Lucknow East, District Lucknow.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that the applicant has falsely been implicated in this case as she has not committed any offence, as alleged in the prosecution story.

4. The attention has been drawn towards the impugned FIR which has been lodged on 15.07.2021, wherein the allegation has been levelled against the present applicant that on the basis of instigation of the present applicant, the victim has committed suicide. The basis of such allegation is one suicide note of the victim which was send to the social media. As per the suicide note, the victim has indicated that the responsible person for suicide of the victim is the present applicant who is mother-in-law of the victim.

5. Sri Nadeem Murtaza, learned counsel for the app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document