MANISH KUMAR
Taslima – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(1) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant and Sri Jayant Singh Tomar, learned A.G.A. for the State.
(2) The present petition has been filed for quashing of the impugned order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the learned 5th Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Gonda on application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. and the same has been treated as complaint case and also prayed to direct the opposite party no.3 to lodged the first information report and investigate the matter and recover the daughter of the petitioner, who is missing since 2.11.2019.
(3) This Court time to time passed the order for apprising the Court regarding investigation conducted by the police after lodging of the F.I.R. In compliance of the order passed, counter affidavit/supplementary counter affidavit, reply to the rejoinder affidavits have been filed in the present case bringing on record the investigation and the efforts made for searching the daughter of the petitioner which is not traceable yet.
(4) From perusal of the affidavit filed on behalf of the State, it has been found that an special team has been constituted for searching the daughter of the petitioner, CDR report were collected to
Sudhir Bhaskar Rao Tambe Vs. Hemand Yashwant Dhage and others
Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anothers
Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. & Others
Vinubhai Haribhai Malviya & others Vs. State of Gujarat and another reported in 2019 (17) SCC 1
King Emperor v. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad AIR 1945 PC 18
Randhir Singh Rana v. State (Delhi Administration) (1997) 1 SCC 361
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.