SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 479

VIVEK CHAUDHARY, OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
Raju Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Urban Employment And Poverty Alleviation Program Lko – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Amrit Khare, Aishvarya Mathur, Apoorva Tewari, Kazim Ibrahim, P.C.Maurya, Akber Ahmad, Akshay Kumar Singh, Alok Kumar, Amiruddin Khan, Amrendra Nath Tripathi, Anshuman Srivastava, Anupam Bajpai , Ausaf Ahmad Khan, Ayush Srivastava, Gaurav Mehrotra, Gibran Akhtar Khan , Gursimran Kaur, Harsh Vardhan Kediya, Inam Uddin Ahmed, Jyoti Rajpoot , Karan Agarwal, Maria Fatima, Mohammad Salman , Mohd. Mohsin, Mohd. Murtaza Hasan, Mudit Agarwal , Nandini Verma, Nisha Tiwari, Pawan Kumar Dwivedi, Pradeep Kumar Srivastava , Raj Kr Singh Suryvanshi, Rajat Srivastava, Rehan Ahmad Siddiqui, Rinku Verma , Ruved Kamal Kidwai, Sachida Nand , Sadiya Khan , Shadab Haider, Shahid Raza , Shakeel Ahmad Jamal , Sheeran Mohiuddin Alavi , Shitla Prasad Tripathi , Shradha Mishra , Shweta Shukla , Surabhi Rawat , Utsav Mishra,
For the Respondent: Anupam Dwivedi, Namit Sharma, Ratnesh Chandra, Anuj Kudesia, Parma Nand Mishra, Sudeep Kumar

JUDGMENT :

1. This is a bunch of writ petitions filed by the slum dwellers of slum area known as Akbar Nagar-1 and 2 challenging the demolition orders issued by the Lucknow Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'the LDA') and for quashing the rehabilitation scheme framed by the LDA. They also pray for a direction to be issued to the respondents to prepare and implement a rehabilitation scheme in accordance with the provisions of the U.P. Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1962') read with the U.P. In-Situ Slum Redevelopment Policy, 2021.

2. Leading Writ-C No.1372 of 2024 "Raju Sahu and others vs State of UP and others" was filed as one of the last cases, when hearing had started, and on the request of Sri J.N. Mathur, learned Senior Counsel for petitioners, the same was taken up as the leading case, as it contained all grounds raised by the petitioners in this bunch. It was agreed that the counter affidavit filed by the LDA in the earlier leading writ petition will be read in the present petition also. It was also agreed that the questions raised in this leading case are mainly questions of law and further counter affi

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
          whatsapp-icon Back to top