SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 251

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Siddharth, Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, JJ.
Dhaunkal And Others – Appellants
Versus
State of U.P.- Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. - 680 of 2001
Decided On : 22-03-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Arvind Agarwal, Rajrshi Gupta

The court emphasized the credibility of dying declarations as substantive evidence, modifying convictions based on the established intent and involvement of the accused in the crime.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 304, 148, and 149 - Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and unlawful assembly - Convicts sentenced to life imprisonment and rigorous imprisonment for various charges - The court found that the dying declaration of the deceased was credible, despite minor inconsistencies, and established the involvement of the accused in the crime. (Paras 1, 52, 54)

(B) Dying Declaration - The court emphasized the importance of the dying declaration as a substantive piece of evidence, provided it inspires confidence and is made in a fit state of mind. (Paras 34, 62)

(C) Burden of Proof - The prosecution must prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, and the benefit of doubt must go to the accused. (Paras 11, 50)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were convicted for the murder of Raju alias Kamta, who was shot by Buddhu and others due to prior enmity. The incident occurred on 10.09.1995, and the deceased's dying declaration was recorded shortly after the incident. (Paras 1, 2, 30)

Findings of Court:
The court modified the conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304(1) IPC for Buddhu, and from Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC to Section 304(1) IPC read with Section 149 IPC for the other appellants, affirming the conviction under Section 148 IPC. (Paras 52, 54)

Issues: The main issues included the reliability of the dying declaration and the adequacy of evidence to support the conviction of the accused. (Paras 11, 50)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the dying declaration was credible and established the guilt of the accused, while also noting the necessity of proving the case beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 34, 62)

Result: The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the convictions and sentences of the appellants. (Paras 54, 56)

JUDGMENT :

R.M.N. Mishra, J.

1. The instant Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the convict /appellants against the judgment and order dated 22.02.2021 passed by learned VIth Additional Session Judge, Fatehpur in Case No.405 of 1996, whereby the appellants are convicted for charge under Section 302 IPC read with section 149 IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life for the said charge. The appellants Dhaukal, Bhaiya Lal, Rajendra and Ram Swaroop are convicted for charge under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, and they are also convicted for charge under Section 148 IPC, sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment for said charge. The appellant Buddhu is convicted for charge under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life. He has also been convicted for charge under Section 148 IPC and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment for said charge. All the sentences are directed to run concurrently.

2. The factual matrix of the case in brief as discerned from the material on record is that FIR in the case was lodged on the basis of written report Ext. Ka-1 of deceased Raju alias Kamta in injured condition which was scribed by one Dharamveer Singh, at Police Station Kishanpur, District Fatehpur on 10.09.1995 at 6:30 PM, wherein he stated that he is a resident of village Rampatiya Ka Purwa, H/o Dariyapur, Police Station Kishanpur, District Fatehpur. His co-villager Dhaukal son of Jodhi had got a criminal case registered against him and his father in which he was bailed out. In view of this enmity the accused, co-villagers Buddhu and Dhaukal sons of Jodhi, Bhaiya Lal son of Ramdev, Rajendra son of Rambhawan and one Ram Swaroop son of Badal, R/o Gokulpur H/o Dariyapur, P.S. Kishanpur, came to him at his agricultural field lying in his village Rampatiya Ka Purwa, where he was weeding, his mother Mantoriya and one Hiruwa son of Kichdu were ploughing the field, as soon as he said to take meal, these persons came near him, and on being given a call by Bhaiya Lal to kill, him come whatever may, he would spend whatever money required, accused Buddhu, fired two shots from his fire arm at him which hit him on his right waist and knee of left leg, he fell down on the spot, the miscreants fled away after the incident. The incident was seen by mother of the injured and witness Hiruwa. As condition of the injured deteriorated, his dying declaration was recorded by Naib Tehsildar (Executive Magistrate) on 11.09.1995 at around 7:45 AM at District Hospital, Fatehpur, wherein he substantially reiterated his version in FIR with variation that in dying declaration he stated that first fire was shot at him by Buddhu, which hit him and thereafter Ramswaroop fired a shot at him by his gun and he fell down. He also stated the accused persons were on inimical terms with him and a scuffle (marpeet) occurred prior to ten days, in which he was sent to jail. The investigation of the case was entrusted to Sub Inspector Kamla Singh, who collected relevant papers including copy of FIR, got the inquest and postmortem examination on dead body of the deceased Rajesh who died during treatment on 17.09.1995 at 04:00 PM at District Hospital, Fatehpur. In postmortem examination report Ext. Ka-3, the cause of death has been shown as Toxemia and Septicemia as a result of ante-mortem injuries. The postmortem was conducted on 19.09.1995 at 04:30 PM and inquest was conducted on 19.09.1995 at 10:00 AM. The Investigating Officer carried out local inspection of the place of incident and prepared a site plan, which is marked as Ext. Ka-4. The medico legal examination of the deceased was conducted in injured condition at C.S.C. Khaga, which is marked as Ext.Ka-2. He was admitted in District Hospital, Fatehpur for his medico legal examination, where he died during treatment. The FIR was initially registered vide Crime No.136 of 1995, under Sections 147, 148,149, 307 IPC at Police Station Kishanpur, District Fatehpur and same

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top