SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Romit Soni – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Bhupendra Nath Tripathi, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anurag Verma, the learned A.G.A-I for the State and Sri. Prateek Tewari, the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.
2. In application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C-8898 of 2024, the applicant has challenged the validity of an order dated 07.06.2023 passed by the Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, C.B.I. (A.P.), Lucknow in Criminal Case No. 64083 of 2023 (State Vs. Romit Soni) and the charge sheet dated 03.06.2022 arising out of Case rime No. 085 of 2021 under Section 306 I.P.C, P.S Mahangar, District Lucknow and in application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C-2038 of 2024, the applicant has challenged the validity of an order dated 15.02.2024 passed by the learned Additional District and Session Judge, Court No.15, Lucknow in Session Trial No. 170 of 2024 (State of U.P. Vs. Romit Soni), arising out of Case rime No. 85 of 2021 under Section 306 I.P.C, P.S Mahangar, District Lucknow North (Commissionerate Lucknow), whereby an application filed by the applicant under Section 227 Cr.P.C for his discharge has been rejected.
3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the oppos
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.