IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ALOK MATHUR, J.
Vinay Patel – Petitioner
Versus
State Of U.P., Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Food And Civil Supply Sectt. Lko. And Others – Respondents
Writ C. No. 11206 Of 2023
Decided On : 13-03-2024
Opportunity to be Heard - Subsequent Allottee - The court set aside the appellate order and remanded the matter back to the appellate authority to decide afresh after giving proper opportunity to the subsequent allottee, in line with the judgment in the case of Ram Kumar Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1312.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a subsequent allottee, challenged the order of the appellate authority on the ground of not being given an opportunity of hearing.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the order, and remanded the matter back to the appellate authority to decide afresh after giving proper opportunity to the petitioner.
Issues: Opportunity of hearing for subsequent allottee, compliance with Supreme Court judgment.
Ratio Decidendi: Even if a subsequent allottee does not have an independent right, they still have a right to be heard and make submissions defending the order of cancellation.
Final Decision: The order dated 23.11.2023 was set aside, and the matter was remanded back to the appellate authority to decide afresh after giving proper opportunity to the petitioner.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Priyam Mishra, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Ms. Nandini Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No. 5.
2. Present writ petition has been filed by assailing the order of the appellate authority merely on the ground that the petitioner who is a subsequent allottee was never given an opportunity of hearing either by the prescribed authority or by the appellate authority and hence the order is illegal and arbitrary and deserves to be set aside.
3. In support of his arguments, he has relied upon the judgment of the Ho'nble Supreme Court in the case of Ram Kumar Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1312 wherein it has been held that even if a subsequent allottee does not have an independent right, he/she still has a right to be heard and to make submissions defending the order of cancellation."
4. Learned counsel for respondents have fairly submitted that the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme court was not complied with and the petitioner was not made a party before the authorities below and also do not dispute the factual aspect.
5. It has been jointly requested that in light of the judgment passed in the case of Ram Kumar (Supra), the appellate order date 23.11.2023 can be set a side and the matter be remanded to be reheard and decided on merits after giving opportunity to the subsequent allottee i.e. petitioner.
6. In light of the above, the writ petition is allowed. The order dated 23.11.2023 is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the appellate authority to decide a fresh after after giving proper opportunity to the petitioner in light of the judgment passed in the case of Ram Kumar (Supra).
7. Considering that much time has lapsed since pendency of the present dispute, the appellate authority is directed to consider and decide the appeal expeditiously, say, within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
8. Parties undertake to cooperate in the appellate proceedings and shall not take any unnecessary adjournments.
Subsequent allottees of fair price shops must be heard in appellate proceedings; failure to do so violates their rights and is contrary to established legal principles.
A subsequent allottee of a Fair Price Shop does not automatically gain the status of a necessary party in appeals concerning the cancellation of previous allotments unless they actively seek to be im....
The subsequent allottee has the right to be heard and make submissions defending the cancellation order, even if they do not have an independent right.
An order cancelling the allotment of land requires adherence to procedural fairness, specifically issuing notice as per statutory provisions.
The court affirmed the right of parties with vested interests to be heard in proceedings affecting their rights, emphasizing the importance of due process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.