IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
VIVEK CHAUDHARY, OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, JJ.
Grs Hotel Pvt. Ltd. Lko. Thru. Director Shri Ganga Charan Rajput - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Thru. Its Secy. (Revenue) Ministry of Finance Govt. of India, New Delhi & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Tax No. 228 of 2023
Decided On : 27-02-2024
Income Tax - Reassessment Proceedings - Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 148A(d) - Section 148 - Section 142(1) - Section 56(2)(x) - U.P. Tax and Registration Adhiniyam, 2013 - Tourism Policy, 2017 - Chartered Accountant Act, 1949 - Companies Act, 2013 - Explanation (b) of Section 139(1) - Section 144B - High Risk CRIU/VRU information category - CBDT Risk Management Strategy - Explanation (t) of Section 144B - Registered Email Address - Legal Service of Notice - Jurisdictional Requirement - Delhi High Court Judgment - Bombay High Court Judgment
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a private limited company, challenged the correctness of the order and notice issued by the Assessing Authority under Section 148-A (d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2019-20. The petitioner's contention was that the notice and order were not served on the correct registered email address, leading to a lack of opportunity to respond.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the notice and order were not served on the correct registered email address of the petitioner, which is a jurisdictional requirement. The Court quashed the order and notice, relegating the parties to the stage of replying to the show cause notice dated 07.03.2023.
Issues: The main issue was the legal service of notice under Section 148A(d) and Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and whether the notice and order were served on the correct registered email address of the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the legal service of notice is a jurisdictional requirement and must be mandatorily complied with. The notice under Section 148A(b) was not served on the correct registered email address of the petitioner, leading to a lack of opportunity to respond, which rendered the subsequent proceedings invalid.
Final Decision: The order dated 26.03.2023 and the consequential notice dated 29.03.2023 were quashed, and the parties were relegated to the stage of replying to the show cause notice dated 07.03.2023. The petitioner was granted an opportunity to file a reply within four weeks, and the Assessing Officer was directed to pass an order in terms of Section 148A(d) of the Act.
JUDGMENT :
Om Prakash Shukla, J.
1. The petitioner challenges the correctness of the order dated 26th March, 2023 passed by the Assessing Authority under Section 148-A (d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act, 1961’) for the Assessment Year 2019-20 and the consequential notice dated 29th March, 2023 issued under Section 148 of the Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2019-20 as also the consequential proceedings undertaken subsequent thereto.
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the brief facts, which led to the filing of this writ petition, are that the petitioner, a private limited company bearing PAN No. AAFCG0658J, is engaged in the business of developing and Managing hotels, motels, resorts, restaurants, cafes and other similar activities.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that for the purpose to achieve its business goal, the petitioner’s company has entered into an agreement to sale/lease dated 18.10.2011 with one Jayveer Singh in respect of his property, namely, ‘Deorhi Darwaza, Purna Mahal’ situated at Khasra No. 1533 in Village Maharaj Nagar, District Mahoba, U.P. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘property’) in distress sale. By the aforesaid agreement for sale/lease deed dated 18.10.2011, the petitioner has also been given possession of the said property from the year 2011-12 onward. The petitioner has also paid the amount of the property as per the agreement for sale/lease deed to the owner of the property. According to the petitioner, the said agreement for sale/lease deed dated 18.10.2011 was exempted from payment of stamp duty in terms of U.P. Tax and Registration Adhiniyam, 2013 and as per Tourism Policy, 2017 of the State of U.P. However, ultimately, after receiving sale consideration of the said property, the owners of the said property had executed sale deed of the property in favour of the petitioner on 16.04.2018 i.e. relevant for the Assessment Year 2019-20. This execution of sale deed dated 16.04.2018 and ownership of the said property are pending adjudication in WPIL No. 418 of 2022 : Mool Chand Anuragi and another Vs. State of U.P. and others, before this Court.
4. Noticing the transaction made in respect of purchase of the said property in the Assessment Year 2019-20, a notice under Section 148A(b) dated 07.03.2023 had been issued by the income tax department to the petitioner on the ground that there had been a heavy financial transaction during the said assessment year for the sale/purchase of a property amounting to Rs.6,31,10,000/- as per section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act.
5. It is the case of the petitioner that for the first time, they received a notice dated 12.10.2023 under Section 142 (1) of the Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2019-20, which was sent to the petitioner on its previous mail address registered on the portal of the Income Tax Department, namely, gmkca1993@gmail.com, which according to the petitioner, is no more registered for the PAN No. AAFCG0658J of the Company. According to him, since the aforesaid notice dated 12.10.2023 was also sent as a copy to the petitioner’s registered email address on the portal of the Income Tax Department i.e. taxmohit56@gmail.com, which according to the petitioner, is presently his registered email I.D. with registered phone no. is 8874271081, on the portal of the Income Tax Department as well as its PAN, he came to learn about the said proceedings. It is also pleaded that the petitioner had been using the present registered email I.D. and registered phone, for filing of their income-tax return for the last three years.
6. According to the petitioner, the petitioner’s company has changed its Chartered Accountant w.e.f. 01.04.2019 as per Chartered Accountant Act, 1949 and Companies Act, 2013 and engaged the new Chartered Accountant for company. Thereafter, the New Charted Accountant has updated the portal of the income tax department with its new mail ID as well as phone number in the year 2019 itself and started using the same sinc
The legal service of notice under the Income Tax Act, 1961 is a jurisdictional requirement and must be mandatorily complied with. Failure to serve notice on the correct registered email address of th....
Issue of notice where income has escaped assessment (1) Before making the assessment, reassessment or re-computation under Section 147, the Income tax Officer shall serve on the Assessee a notice con....
Notice u/s 148 served on 01.04.2021 via email, despite digital signing on 31.03.2021, deemed issued post-amendment; reassessment quashed for non-compliance with section 148A procedure.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.