JUDGMENT :

SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

1. Heard Sri D.K. Agrawal and Ms Anupriya Agarwal Advocates, the learned Counsel for the applicants, Sri Virendra Kumar, the learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Sushil Kumar Singh, Sri Prabhat Pandey and Sri Mahesh Kumar Advocates, the learned Counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

2. By means of the instant application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the applicants have sought quashing of the Charge Sheet No. 14 of 2016 dated 24.12.2016 submitted in furtherance of Case Crime No. 10 of 2016, Police Station, Mahila Thana, District Amethi under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. They have also sought quashing of the order dated 27.03.2017 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sultanpur in Case No. 1818 of 2017, taking cognizance of the aforesaid offences and summoning the applicants to face trial of the aforesaid offences.

3. The aforesaid case was instituted on the basis of an FIR lodged by the opposite party No. 2 on 22.07.2016 stating that the informant had got his daughter married to the applicant No. 1 on 15.02.2015. Wedding ceremony was solemnized at Etawah. The informant had spent Rs. 15,00,000/- in