IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
AJIT KUMAR, J.
Mukesh Kumar Yadav – Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and Others – Respondents
Writ (A) No. 9377 of 2024
Decided On : 01-08-2024
APPLICATION - Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission Recruitment - Rajendra Patel v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2015 All 161 (FB); Dolly Chhanda Vs Chairman, JEE; Secretary, UP Public Service Commission Vs. S. Krishna Chaitanya - The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to the strict deadlines set by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission for submitting application forms and requisite documents. It interpreted the legal provisions as mandating that failure to comply with these deadlines results in automatic disqualification, regardless of the reasons for the delay. The court upheld the principle that procedural requirements must be strictly observed to maintain the integrity of the recruitment process.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner applied for the post of Assistant Private Secretary in response to an advertisement by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission, which required submission of a hard copy of the application and necessary documents by April 5, 2024. The petitioner failed to submit the required documents by the deadline, claiming it was an inadvertent mistake.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner did not submit the hard copy of the application and requisite documents by the stipulated deadline. It referenced the Full Bench judgment in Rajendra Patel, which established that failure to meet the submission requirements results in disqualification, and that the Commission is not liable for such failures.
Issues: Whether the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission is obligated to accept applications submitted after the prescribed deadline due to inadvertent mistakes by candidates.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that strict adherence to the deadlines set by the Commission is essential for the integrity of the recruitment process. It concluded that the conditions outlined in the advertisement must be observed, and failure to comply results in automatic disqualification, regardless of the circumstances surrounding the failure.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, affirming that the petitioner’s failure to submit the application and documents by the deadline precluded any further consideration of his candidacy.
JUDGMENT :
AJIT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard Sri Thakur Prasad Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sanjay Kumar Om, learned counsel for the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission.
2. Petitioner before this Court has been an applicant against the advertisement issued for the post of Assistant Private Secretary in Uttar Pradesh Secretariat advertised by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission on 19th September, 2023. It was prescribed under the advertisement that soon after submitting the online application, the printout of the hard copy of the said application shall be drawn by the petitioner and shall submit all the requisite documents regarding essential qualification on or before 5th April, 2024. It was further noticed under the advertisement that beyond the prescribed date no application will be entertained.
3. It is an admitted case of the petitioner that he could not submit the offline application form along with documents but he submits that since it was a sheer mistake inadvertently committed and since he had qualified the preliminary examination his candidature ought not to have been cancelled.
4. Per contra, it is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission that under the advertisement there was a clear condition stipulated that till 5:00 pm on 5th April, 2024 the hard copy of the application should be submitted along with documents and if it were not submitted/ deposited in the office of Public Service Commission, then no further time will be allowed and no application shall be entertained subsequently.
5. Sri Om has argued that it is settled legal position that if a candidate fails to submit either application or requisite documents up to the last date prescribed under the advertisement, no further opportunity can be afforded to such candidate and for such negligence, may be due to inadvertence, subsequently application at the instance of such candidate cannot be allowed. He has also placed reliance upon the Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Rajendra Patel v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, AIR 2015 All 161 (FB), where a candidate failed to submit the offline form within the prescribed period. In the said judgment the Court has very categorically held that once the conditions stipulated under the advertisement are not fulfilled the department cannot be held liable for the same and candidate will have to suffer.
6. I have perused the records and find it to be an admitted position that petitioner in his knowledge failed to submit offline applications along with requisite documents to Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission till 5:00 of the last date i.e. 5th April, 2024. The Full Bench of this Court in the case of Rajendra Patel (supra) was constituted to decide following reference:
7. Holding the judgment of Division Bench in the case of Nirbhay Kumar v. Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (Special Appeal No. 541 of 2014 decided on 30th May, 2014) not to be laying down correct law, the Full Bench (supra) making observations upon the principles of law on the point, concluded thus:
Rajendra Patel v. State of U.P. and another, AIR 2015 All 161 (FB)
The court established that compliance with application submission deadlines is mandatory, and failure to meet these deadlines, regardless of the reasons, results in disqualification from the recruitm....
Point of Law : Postal authority cannot be treated as an agent of the Commission so as to treat the dispatch of the application before the last date by post, as having been submitted before the last d....
Eligibility for public service positions must consider the actual date of qualification acquisition rather than the issuance date of physical documents.
In cases of postal delay, the responsibility lies with the sender, and the delay caused by the postal department cannot be attributed to the recipient.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.