SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 860

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, JJ.
Ram Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Others – Respondents
Special Appeal No. 345 of 2024
Decided On : 24-05-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Avneesh Tripathi.
For the Respondent: Rohan Gupta.

The Board of Governors of IIT Kanpur has the authority to establish recruitment rules and qualifications, and courts should not interfere in policy matters unless there is a clear legal error.

Headnote:(A) Institutes of Technology Act, 1961 - Sections 33(2)(b), 10, 11, 13, 25, 26, and 27 - Recruitment and Promotion Rules - The appellant, initially appointed as Junior Engineer, challenged the eligibility criteria for Executive Engineer posts, claiming arbitrary conditions imposed by the Board of Governors - The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition, affirming the Board's authority to set recruitment rules and qualifications - The court found no merit in the appellant's claims regarding age and qualifications, emphasizing the Board's discretion in policy matters. (Paras 17-48)

(B) Judicial Review - The court held that it cannot interfere with the employer's discretion in determining qualifications for recruitment, as this falls within the realm of policy decisions. (Paras 26-31)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was appointed as Junior Engineer in 1988 and later promoted to Senior Assistant Engineer. He contested the eligibility criteria for Executive Engineer positions, claiming they were arbitrary and discriminatory.

Findings of Court:
The learned Single Judge upheld the Board's authority to set qualifications and dismissed the writ petition, stating the appellant was ineligible due to age and lack of challenge to the governing rules.

Issues: The main issues included the Board's authority to set recruitment criteria and whether the appellant's claims were valid without challenging the underlying rules.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Board of Governors has the authority to establish recruitment rules and that the qualifications set forth are within their discretion, emphasizing that courts should not interfere in policy matters.

Result: Special Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.

1. Heard Sri Avneesh Tripathi, learned counsel for the appellant-petitioner and Sri Rohan Gupta, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 to 4.

2. Present Special Appeal has arisen from a judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 11th March, 2024 passed in Writ Appeal No. 19126 of 2023 (Ram Pratap Singh and another vs. Union of India and others) by which the writ petition filed by the appellant-petitioner has been dismissed.

FACTS

3. The facts giving rise to this appeal in a nutshell are that the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur [IIT-Kanpur] is an engineering institute. Initially, it was a society and subsequently, it was incorporated by the Central Government under the Institutes of Technology Act, 1961. [IT Act, 1961] Initially, the appellant-petitioner was appointed as a Junior Engineer (Trainee) in the pay scale of Rs.1400-2600 in IIT-Kanpur on April 27, 1988 on temporary and adhoc basis for a period of two years from the date of his joining and the said period was extended for a further period of six months vide Office order dated 10.05.1990. Subsequently, his pay scale of Rs.1400-2600 was changed to Rs.5000-8000/-. In January, 1991 the IIT-Kanpur had published an advertisement for appointment on the post of Junior Engineer and finally, the appellant was selected on the said post.

4. Thereafter, the appellant applied against the advertisement No. 2/2005 and he was duly selected on the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) on regular basis with effect from 14.12.2005 (F/N) or the date of assumption of charge on the position of Assistant Engineer (Civil), whichever is later. He was accorded the first financial upgradation in the Grade Pay of Rs.4600/-vide Office Order dated 08.05.2014 and later on was promoted to the post of Senior Assistant Engineer (SG) in the pay scale of Rs.33100-187800 Level-9 with Grade Pay of Rs.5400/-, with effect from 01.01.2018, vide Office Order dated 30.01.2019. The pay scale of Rs.33,100-1,87,800/-was the same pay scale as given to the promoted Senior Assistant Engineer/Assistant Engineer.

5. Meanwhile, the Board of Directors in its 227th meeting dated 11.10.2018 had approved the Recruitment and Promotion Rules in respect of non-academic staff. The IIT Kanpur decided to adopt and implement the Recruitment and Promotion Rules as per procedures approved by the Board. Thereafter, the promotion policy was notified vide Office Order dated 27.11.2018. The appellant claims that his right to promotion got affected by the new policy and as such, he represented the matter before the IIT Kanpur on 14.06.2019. The same was examined by the Institute Level Grievance Redressal Committee and the Board-Sub Committee, constituted for grievance examinations, wherein it was found that there is no merit in the claim set up by the appellant and he was advised to apply for the promotion as and when the post is advertised, subject to meeting the eligibility criteria. Therefore, the Board of Governors in its 244th meeting dated 12th January, 2022 had refused to accept his request and the same was communicated to him vide letter dated 28.02.2022 issued by the Deputy Registrar (Admin.) of IIT Kanpur.

6. It is claimed that the appellant possessed all the essential qualifications required for being considered for appointment on the post of Executive Engineer. It transpires that in the earlier advertisement dated 25.05.2015 at serial no. 3 the posts of Executive Engineer (Electrical) (reserved for OBCs) & Air-conditioning (UR) were mentioned and the applications were invited from the Assistant Executive Engineer with 5 years service in the grade; or Graduate Assistant Engineers with 8 years service in the grade or Diploma holders Assistant Engineers with outstanding records & ability and 10 years service in the grade. Thereafter, the IIT Kanpur had published an advertisement no. 1/2023 dated 16.9.2023 inviting applications for recruitment on various posts including five post

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top