SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Rajshi Processors, Raebareli Having Office Thru. Its Partner Ashok Kumar Lakhotia – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of State Tax Govt. Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hon’ble Subhash Vidyarthi J.
1. Heard Shri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the review petitioner.
2. By means of the instant review petition, the petitioner is seeking review of a judgment and order dated 14.05.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Tax No.128 of 2024.
3. The petitioner is engaged in manufacture and sale of Aluminum Casting & Machinery Parts. The petitioner had filed GSTR 3B for the months of May, 2019, August, 2019 and December, 2019. The Deputy Commissioner, Special Investigation Branch, Commercial Tax, Lucknow had conducted a survey of the place of business on 25.02.2020. The petitioner claimed to have received inward supplies worth Rs.16,39,200/-from M/s Ridhi Sidhi Enterprises, worth Rs. 17,25,160/-from M/s Siddhartha Trading Company and worth Rs. 29,78,025/-from M/s Satvik Enterprises and claimed Rs.2,95,056/-, Rs.2,63,160/-and Rs. 4,54,275/-respectively towards I.T.C. Claim for inward supplies received from the aforesaid firms. Special Investigation Branch, Agra conducted a survey of the aforesaid three firms whereupon it came to light that all the aforesaid three firms were non-existent and bogus firms and the petitioner had fraudulently claimed I.T.C
Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury (1995) 1 SCC 170
Parsion Devi v. Sumitri Devi (1997) 8 SCC 715
S. Bagirathi Ammal v. Palani Roman Catholic Mission (2009) 10 SCC 464
Sow Chandra Kante v. Sheikh Habib (1975) 1 SCC 674
Thungabhadra Industries Ltd. v. Govt. of A.P. (1964) 5 SCR 174
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.