JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

1. Heard Sri Dwijendra Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4.

2. In the light of proposed order notice to private respondent nos. 5 to 20 is dispensed with.

3. By means of present writ petition the petitoiners have challenged order dated 21.02.2024, passed in Revision No. 34 of 2024 -Kafil Ahmad Vs. Syed Mohd. Rahman, passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Sultanpur.

4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners had filed objections under Section 9-A(II) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, claiming their right over Plot Nos. 1119, 1120, 1121, 1122, 1123, 1124, 1125, 1126, 1127, 1128, 1129, 1130, 1131, 1111, 1112, 1137, 870, 1138, 1247, 1114, 779/3, 842, 843 and 2661, situated at Village -Kisni, Pargana -Jagdishpur, Tehsil -Musafirkhana, Sultanpur (now Amethi). The petitioners claimed their right over on the basis that same was owned and possessed by their ancestors and have devolved on them on the basis of General Rule of Succession. It was state