JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari, J.

1. Heard Sri Ashwini Kumar, learned counsel for revisionist and Sri Santosh Kumar Kesarwani, Advocate holding brief of Sri Girish Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for opposite parties.

2. Present revision has been filed seeking following relief:-

“It, is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the further proceeding of S.C.C. Case No. 34 of 2013 (Rama Raman vs. Mahendra Pratap Singh) pending before Additional District Judge, Court No. 14/Special Judge Gangster Act, Varanasi.”

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that respondents have filed S.C.C. Case No. 34 of 2013 in which revisionist has filed written statement on 05.02.2014 admitting the tenancy. After change of counsel, it was found that documents so annexed alongwith written statement is having a ‘license deed’, but due to typographical error, it is mentioned as ‘tenant’. He next submitted that after change of counsel, amendment application dated 23.03.2022 has been moved under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC for substitution of word, ‘licensee’ in place of word, ‘tenant’ which was rejected on the ground that first of all any admission made in wr