Back
RAHUL CHATURVEDI, MOHD. AZHAR HUSAIN IDRISI
Saurabh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. trial court's judgment and details of the appeals. (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background of the case. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments from the defense about absence in fir. (Para 4 , 20) |
| 4. court observations on evidence and witness reliability. (Para 10 , 11 , 53) |
| 5. court's reasoning regarding the reliability of witnesses. (Para 19 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 6. eyewitness account discrepancies. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 7. arguments presented by counsel regarding evidence. (Para 29) |
| 8. conclusion on conviction and ruling. (Para 60 , 61) |
| 9. final judgment regarding appeal and acquittal. (Para 62) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Rajiv Lochan Shukla, learned counsel for the appellant assisted by Sri K.K. Pandey as well as Sri Dileep Kumar, Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Amit Singh, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A. representing the State of Uttar Pradesh On account of certain gray areas in the instant appeal we have sought an assistance from the learned counsel for the appellant to further argue the case and clarify those areas in the appeal. Which was done by the counsel in the month of May, 2024 and now we are in position to decide the matter finally on merits. After hearing the rival s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
