SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 858

GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA, RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Suresh Chandra Pathak – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri R.K. Sharma - Senior Advocate With Shri Sanjay Gupta, Shri M.K. Choudhary And Ms. Bhavya Sharma - Advocates, for the Appellant; Shri A.K. Nirankari- Advocate Shri Sushil Goswami - Advocate for The Complainant, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

G.S. Ahluwalia, J. - By this common judgment, Cr.A. Nos.379 of 2012 and 401 of 2012 shall be decided.

2. Both the Criminal Appeals have been filed against the Judgment and Sentence dated 3-5-2012 passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Gwalior in S.T. No.340/2011 by which the Appellants have been convicted and sentenced for the following offences :

Appellant

Conviction

Sentence

Suresh Chandra Pathak

302/34 of IPC,

Life Imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/- in default 6 months R.I.

Banti@ Nogendra

302/34 of IPC

Life Imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/- in default 6 months R.I.

Khemraj @ Khemu

302/34 of IPC,

Life Imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/- in default 6 months R.I.

30 of ARMS ACT

6 months R.I. and fine of Rs.2,000/- in default 1 month R.I.

307 of IPC

4 years R.I. and fine of Rs.5,000/- in default 6 months R.I.

Pawan Pathak

302 of IPC

Life Imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/- in default 6 months R.I.

30 of ARMS ACT

6 months R.I. and fine of Rs.2,000/- in default 1 month R.I.

201 of I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top