Back
CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Rani Jai Ratan Kaur – Appellant
Versus
D. D. C. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Chandra Kumar Rai, J.) :
1. Heard Shri V.K. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri S. Shekhar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri Anil Bhushan, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Arpan Shrivastav, learned counsel for contesting respondent Nos.3 and 4 and Shri Sharad Chandra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the Staterespondents.
2. Brief facts of the case are that village Patka Bogha, Pargana, Khairagarh, District Allahabad came under consolidation operation by way of notification issued under Section 4 of Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, (hereinafter referred to as "U.P.C.H. Act") in the year 1971. According to petitioner No.1 a patta was executed by Raja Sahab in favour of petitioner No.1 in 1929 for maintenance as petitioner No.1 was living separately from her husband and petitioner No.1 being disable to do cultivation sublet the land to respondent Nos. 3 and 4. In the Basic Year of Consolidation Operation, petitioners were recorded as Bhumidhar of the plots of Khata No.3 situated in aforementioned village as mentioned in paragraph No.5 of the writ petition and respondent No.3 was recorded in class-7 as Asami. D
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of following the mandatory procedures for recording possession in land records and the requirements for adverse possession.
A claim of adverse possession must demonstrate clear, hostile, and continuous possession for over 12 years, supported by genuine records; incorrect or surreptitious entries do not confer any rights.
The court ruled that title objections under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act must be decided on merit, emphasizing the need for proper jurisdiction and evidence rather than relying on alleged c....
The Court upheld that the relevant date for determining land rights is the date of vesting, and concurrent findings of authorities should not be disturbed unless proven to be perverse.
Point of Law : Civil Law - Possession - A party laying his claim on basis of adverse possession in some property has to prove as to date, time and manner in which possession is converted into open, h....
The main legal point established is that rights recognized by statute could be settled through conciliation, and a compromise would not be valid if it violated the provisions of the U.P.C.H. Rules.
An ex parte decree operates as res judicata in subsequent proceedings unless it is set aside by the court that passed it.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
