RAHUL CHATURVEDI, NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Anwar Alam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Justice Nalin Kumar Srivastava, J.
Re: Criminal Misc. Application (Leave to Appeal)
1. This application has been preferred by the learned Stated counsel under Section 395/397, 120-B I.P.C., 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act and Section 5 Explosive Act with the prayer that the leave to appeal be granted against the judgment and order dated 5.8.2023 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge/ F.T.C.-02, Azamgarh in S.T. No. 171 of 2003 (State Versus Khalilurrahman and Ors) arising out of case crime no. 425H of 2000, P.S.-Mubarakpur, District- Azamgarh, whereby the accused persons/ respondents total 22 in number namely 1. Anwar Alam son of Gulam Rasool, 2. Matiurrahman son of Gulam Rasul 3. Gufran son of Abdul Rashid 4. Mohd. Faisal son of Abdul Rashid 5. Munir son of Hazi Khalil 6. Ayub son of Mohd. Hasan 7. Mohd. Shahid son of Abdul Mani 8. Jamal Akhtar son of Hazi Abdul Mani 9. Faridul Haq son of Abdul Zabbar 10. Asrar Ahmad son of Hazi Irshad 11. Nausad son of Hazi Gaffar 12. Shakeel alia Jheenak son of Masood Ahmad 13. Inamul Haq son of Habirruhman 14. Abdul Mannan son of Abdul Gaffar 15. Shamshul Haq son of Hazi Ali Ahmad 16. Ayub Fauji son of Suleman 17. Zameel son of
Chandrappa vs. State of Karnataka
Girija Nandini Devi V. Bigendra Nandini Choudhary (1967) 1 SCR 93:(AIR 1967 SC 1124)
Jayaswamy vs. State of Karnataka
Luna Ram vs. Bhupat Singh and others
M.S. Narayana Menon @ Mani vs. State of Kerala and another
Mookkiah and another vs. State Representatives by the Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu
Samsul Haque v. State of Assam
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.