Vatika Grah Gram Samiti Allahabad vs State of U. P.

Breaking News

Back Next

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2020

KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA
Vatika Grah Gram Samiti Allahabad – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Manu Saxena.
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT :

(Kshitij Shailendra, J.) :

Supplementary-affidavit filed today is taken on record.

2. Heard Shri Manu Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Shir Azad Rai, learned counsel representing the Gaon Sabha.

3. Certain orders were passed under Section 38 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 on 24.2.2020 and 28.7.2022.

4. This Court passed the following interim order dated 6.1.2023 in Writ C No. 211 of 2023 (Vatika Grah Gram Samiti Allahabad v. Commissioner Prayagraj Division and 7 others), staying the effect and operation of the aforesaid orders as well as directing that the petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the land in dispute:

''Heard Shri Manu Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1 to 5 and Shri Azad Rai, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 6 and 7.

Counsel for the petitioner is not pressing the writ petition in respect to prayer No. C as such writ petition is being entertained in res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document