IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, VINOD DIWAKAR, JJ.
Nabi Ahmad - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal Nos. 7302, 6660, 7194, 7319, 7320, 7326, 7330 and 7332 of 2022
Decided on : 02-05-2023
Criminal - Murder - IPC Sections 147, 148, 302, 307 - The court interpreted the provisions of the IPC regarding unlawful assembly, murder, and attempt to murder, emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence and the weight of eyewitness testimony in establishing guilt.
Fact of the Case:
The accused-appellants were convicted for the murder of two individuals during a land dispute, with the incident captured on CCTV. The prosecution presented eyewitnesses and medical evidence linking the accused to the crime.
Finding of the Court:
The court found sufficient evidence, including eyewitness accounts and medical reports, to convict the accused-appellants for their roles in the murders, despite claims of inconsistencies and a flawed investigation.
Issues: Whether the prosecution proved the charges against the accused-appellants beyond a reasonable doubt, considering the eyewitness testimonies and the admissibility of CCTV footage.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the eyewitness testimony, corroborated by medical evidence, was sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused, despite challenges regarding the investigation and evidence collection.
Result: The appeal was dismissed, upholding the convictions of the accused-appellants.
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar, J.-We have heard Shri Raghuvansh Misra, Shri Vimlendu Tripathi, Shri Rajeev Lochan Shukla, learned counsels for the appellants, Shri I.D. Mishra learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The accused-appellants-Nabi Ahmad, Banta @ Beant Singh, Rizwan, Farookh, Amanveer Singh, Ranjeet Kaur, Karam Singh and Gurpawan Kaur have been convicted in Sessions Trial No. 379 of 2017 (State of Uttar Pradesh v. Amanveer Singh and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 419 of 2017, under Sections 147, 148, 452, 307/149, 302/149, 506 I.P.C., alongwith connected Sessions Trial Nos. 377 of 2017 and 378 of 2017, arising out of Case Crime Nos. 431 of 2017 and 432 of 2017 respectively, Police Station Bisalpur, District Rampur and the maximum sentence of life imprisonment is awarded to all the accused-appellants. The rest of the sentences are lesser sentences, and all the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.
3. As per the prosecution case, the complainant's real brother Gurcharan Singh was murdered about two and a half years ago due to family enmity over land, whose case is pending trial in District Rampur. An attempt was also made to kill the complainant's real sister, Jaspal Kaur, and its report was registered at P.S. Bilaspur. On 28.6.2017 at around 03.00 p.m., the complainant's father, Sukhwinder Singh, was busy in the demarcation of land with the help of Patwari, Kanoongo and two police officers. All of a sudden, the complainant heard the commotion and saw Amanveer Singh son of Karam Singh, Karam Singh, Ranjeet Kaur, Gurpawan Kaur, Banta Singh, Nabi Ahmad @ Nabia, Farookh Ahmad and son of Nabia Ahmad, alongwith some unknown persons barged into the house of the complainant and shouted, no one should be spared today. After hearing the threatening call, all started running here and there to save their lives. Meanwhile, Amanveer Singh and his accomplice Nabia and Farookh shot at the complainant's maternal uncle Jaspal Singh and caused severe injuries. The complainant's mother also rushed inside the house to save her life. Amanveer shot at her from his pistol and caused grievous injuries to her. The complainant's real sister Jaspal Kaur hid inside the bathroom. Amanveer broke the door and shot her dead. She died on the spot. The complainant and her mother saw Jaspal being shot at; thereafter, Amanveer shot at the complainant's father, Sukhwinder Singh, and somehow he saved his life. The entire incident was captured in a CCTV camera installed at the complainant's house. After hearing the sound of the gunshot, the police and local people arrived, and on their challenge, the assailants fled towards the sugarcane field.
4. On the basis of such written complaint, Case Crime No. 419 of 2017 at P.S. Bilaspur, District Rampur, was registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 307/149, 302/149 and 506 I.P.C. Thereafter, the police initiated the investigation.
5. Jaspal Singh and Gurmeet Kaur were seriously injured in the shoot-out, whereas Jaspal Kaur died on the spot. The deceased age was 28 years. The following ante-mortem injuries were present on the dead body.
(b) Fire-arm wound of entry 2.5cm x 1.00 cm viscera deep at the back of the chest towards left 9 cm below left shoulder and collar of abrasion was present.''
6. The Doctor opined the cause of death was a result of shock and excessive bleeding due to ante-mortem injuries.
7. The injured Jaspal Singh was immediately taken to the hospital, and he died on the next day i.e. on 29.6.2017, at Gangasheel Hospital following ante-mortem injuries were noticed :
(b) Surgical w
Chaman Lal v. State of U.P. and another
Dataram Singh v. State of U.P.
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan and another
Kashmira Singh v. State of Punjab
Kishorij Lal v. Rupa and others
The judgment underscores the importance of eyewitness testimony and medical evidence in establishing guilt in serious criminal cases, particularly murder.
The judgment establishes that inconsistencies in witness testimony and lack of corroborative evidence can warrant suspension of sentences pending appeal.
Insufficient evidence for conspiracy and murder conviction justifies bail for certain appellants.
Gravity alone cannot be a decisive ground to deny bail, rather competing factors are required to be balanced by court while exercising its discretion.
Suspending a sentence for a serious offence like murder requires a rare demonstration of exceptional circumstances, without re-evaluating evidence during bail applications.
The judgment addresses the sufficiency of evidence in murder and conspiracy cases, emphasizing that mere presence or signaling cannot constitute complicity in a crime.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.