IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, PRASHANT KUMAR, JJ.
Divine Faith Fellowship Church and Another - Petitioners
Versus
State of U.P. and Others - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 30476 of 2023
Decided On : 26-09-2023
Minorities - Writ Petition - National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992, Section 9 - The court emphasized the limited jurisdiction of the National and U.P. Commissions for Minorities, clarifying that they cannot adjudicate property disputes or act as courts, thus dismissing the petition.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, a church NGO, sought a mandamus for compliance with orders from the National Commission for Minorities regarding eviction of an unauthorized occupant from church property, after previous orders were ignored.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Commissions exceeded their jurisdiction by attempting to resolve property disputes, which are not within their statutory powers, and emphasized the need for adherence to their defined roles.
Issues: Whether the National and U.P. Commissions for Minorities have the authority to adjudicate property disputes and compel compliance with their orders.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Commissions are not courts and cannot exercise judicial powers to resolve disputes, reaffirming their role as recommendatory bodies.
Result: The writ petition was dismissed as devoid of merits.
JUDGMENT :
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, J.
Heard Ms. Akanksha Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Uttara Bahuguna, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 4 and 5.
2. The petitioners have filed the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus upon respondent Nos. 4 and 5 for complying with the orders dated 12.12.2022 and 17.4.2023 passed by the National Commission for Minorities, Government of India (hereinafter referred to as 'the Commission').
3. Petitioner-Divine Faith Fellowship Church, Sambhal claims to be a Non-Governmental Organization (in short 'NGO'), which works for promotion and betterment of the Christian Community. Petitioners further claim that they have 17 shops around Church area, which is property of the Church. In one of the shops bearing Shop No. 13/1 some land grabbers have entered into possession illegally. Petitioners moved an application on 4.6.2022 before U.P. Commission for Minorities (hereinafter referred to as 'the U.P. Commission') seeking direction upon respondent Nos. 4 and 5 for eviction of respondent No. 6, who according to the petitioner was an unauthorized occupant of the shop in question. The U.P. Commission considered this application as a civil case and issued notices to the Government officers to appear before it. Accordingly, Nayab Tehsildar appeared before the U.P. Commission and submitted its report stating that Shop No. 13/1 was leased out by the Church to one Mr. Amit son of Satish Chandra and Kamal son of Kalyan Das, who is said to be the encroacher, was actually the partner of Amit, who was the tenant of the petitioner. Since, the Church wanted to throw out the tenant, a case of encroachment was set up against the partner of the tenant. On this, the U.P. Commission directed the Nayab Tehsildar to get the copy of the Lease Deed or Partnership Deed, which was executed between the tenant and his partner. Obviously, the private document was not with the Officer and the same could not be produced. In fact, a document was produced by the petitioners wherein it was said that the Partnership Deed between Amit and Kamal has come to an end, hence, Kamal could not be in possession of the shop in question. It is then that the U.P. Commission had gone ahead and came to a conclusion that Kamal has illegally taken possession of Shop No. 13/1 situated in Church area and the tenant has helped him to do so, hence, both are liable to be punished. The U.P. Commission further ordered that an FIR be registered against Kamal as he was found by the U.P. Commission to be an illegal occupant.
4. When the order passed by the U.P. Commission was not complied with, the petitioners sent another representation to the National Commission for Minorities, Government of India at New Delhi. The Commission again treated the application as a case and called the officers to appear before it. After hearing the petitioners and the Sub Divisional Magistrate (on behalf of the concerned District Magistrate), passed an order on 12.12.2022 that the respondents (District Administration) should help the petitioners to get the possession of the shop in question from the trespassers. The Commission further directed the respondents to remove the encroachment within 15 days after completion of local election and send a report to the Commission.
5. Since, order of the Commission passed on 12.12.2022 was not complied with, so the petitioners have filed the instant petition with the following prayers :
''(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 4 (i.e. District Magistrate, Sambhal) and respondent No. 5 (i.e.Sub Divisional Magistrate, District Sambhal) and to direct them to ensure compliance of orders dated 12.12.2022' and 17.4.202' passed by the National Commission of India, Government of India.
(ii) to issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.
(iii) to award cost
Brij Nandan Sinha v. Jyoti Narayan
Ganesan v. T.N. Hindu Religious & Chariatable Endowments Board
Divisional Manager, Aravali Golf Club and another v. Chander Hass and another
AI
The National and U.P. Commissions for Minorities lack jurisdiction to adjudicate property disputes, functioning only as recommendatory bodies under their respective Acts.
The Minorities Commission cannot adjudicate individual financial disputes; its role is to protect minority rights, not to resolve personal grievances.
State Commission lacks adjudicatory authority; it cannot determine caste or tribe status of individuals or demand caste certificate production.
Educational institutions - Protects right of minorities - Discrimination on basis of religion, caste, sex etc - It is clear that framers of Constitution intended that State shall not deny to any pers....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes exceeded its jurisdiction and acted as an adjudicatory authority, which was beyond its powers. Th....
The National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes lacks jurisdiction to investigate individual caste status claims, which violates natural justice principles.
The National Commission for Scheduled Castes has the constitutional duty to investigate and monitor matters relating to the safeguards provided for Scheduled Castes and to inquire into specific compl....
Point of Law : A perusal of Section 2(a) of the said Act, court could gather that Chairman shall be a person of a minority community and 8 other members from the minority communities hold a degree fr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.