SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2107

J. J. MUNIR
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Raghav Ram, Vibha Diwedi.

JUDGMENT :

J.J. MUNIR, J.

1. The applicant seeks quashing of proceedings of Sessions Case No. 575 of 2020, State v. Om Prakash (Arising Out of Case Crime No. 339 of 2020), under Sections 376(1), 323, 357-ka, 504, 506 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 and Section 7 /8 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (‘the Act of 2012’ for short), Police Station Kotwali, District Jhansi, pending before the Special Judge (POCSO Act) Jhansi.

2. According to the First Information Report (‘FIR’ for short) lodged by the complainant- opposite party No. 2, the said opposite party is a widow and became friends with the applicant, Om Prakash, who held out a false promise to marry her. The complainant has five children - two daughters and three sons begotten of her deceased husband. The FIR further says that on 23.08.2020, the complainant, deceitfully promising to marry her, had carnal relations with her and also molested her daughter with questionable intentions. Thereafter, he beat up the complainant. On 26.08.2020 at 10 o'clock in the night, the applicant ravished the complainant. On the basis of the said FIR, the present crime has been registered, including offences of rape and those und

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top