SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1423

KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA
Omika Devi – Appellant
Versus
Indian Bank – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : H.K Asthana, Harish Kumar Tripathi.
For the Respondents: Habib Ahmad.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding injunction and partition. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court's analysis on the scope of legal remedies. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. rejection of injunction application. (Para 11)
5. conclusion on appeal dismissal. (Para 12)

JUDGMENT :

(Kshitij Shailendra, J.)

1. Heard Shri H.K. Asthana, learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant and Shri Habib Ahmad, learned counsel for the respondent No.1-Bank.

2. Counter and rejoinder affidavits in between the appellant and respondent No.1 have been exchanged. In view of the order proposed to be passed, it is not necessary to issue notice to the remaining respondents, particularly when the matter is running in the list of fresh cases for the last one year.

3. The instant appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE , 1908 assails the validity of order dated 19.10.2023 whereby the learned Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Gorakhpur has rejected the plaintiff's injunction application in Original Suit No.186 of 2022 (Smt. Omika Devi v. Indian Bank (Allahabad Bank) and others).

4. Assailing the order impugned, learned counsel for the appellant submits that though th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top