SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1594

RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Assistant Sub Inspector (M) Brajesh Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sushil Kumar Pathak.

JUDGMENT :

RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.

1. Heard Sri S.K. Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Deepshikha, learned Chief Standing Counsel-II for the State-opposite parties.

2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following reliefs:

    “(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opp. party no. 1 i.e. the Principal secretary, Grah Police Anubhag-1, Home Department, Civil Secretariat, Lucknow to consider and decide the Representation of the petitioner dated 26/12/2023 under Rule 25 of Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991, as contained in Annexure No. 6 to this Writ Petition, by way of passing a speaking and reasoned order, within the stipulated period.

    (ii) Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem appropriate and proper in the circumstances and allow this Writ Petition with substantial costs, throughout.”

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court towards Annexure No. 6 of the writ petition, which is a representation of the petitioner being filed under Rule 25 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the Subordinate Ran

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top