Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Ajit Kumar
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of UP – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ajit Kumar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner though has prayed for quashing of various orders passed by the authorities imposing penalty in the nature of adverse entries of censure, withholding of salary for certain period, etc, however, now learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is confining his prayer for a writ of mandamus to command the state Government to consider and decide the representation made by the petitioner on 17.05.2025.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised preliminary objection as to the maintainability of this petition on the ground that petitioner should have first exhausted alternative statutory remedy of appeal before preferring revision.
4. Meeting the preliminary objection learned counsel for petitioner has placed reliance upon Division Bench judgment of this Court at Lucknow in the case of Munna Lal vs. State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary Home Department Lko and 2 others Writ A No. 2359 of 2025 wherein meeting the similar objection the Court vide paragraphs 13, 14, 15,16,17, 23, 25, 26 and 28 has held th
The limitation period for challenging an adverse disciplinary order begins from the date a statutory representation is decided, not from the original order date, applying the doctrine of merger.
Service Matter - Minor Punishment - Appeal - As per Rules of 1991 a delinquent employee who is awarded minor punishments of censure entries under Rule 4 (b) can file an appeal under Rule 20 of Rules ....
Point Law : whose appeal has been rejected by any authority subordinate to the Government is entitled to submit an application for revision to the superior authority next to the authority who has re....
Representation under Rule 25 cannot bypass statutory appeal and revision processes as per the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991.
It is well settled that in order to raise the plea that the claim petition is within the period of limitation and not barred by it, it must be shown that the remedy been followed or availed of was a ....
The court held that complaints under the Sexual Harassment Act must follow established procedural rules, and if norms of natural justice are breached, the recommendations may be invalid despite alter....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
