SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1663

ANISH KUMAR GUPTA
Shashwat Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Anurag Pathak, Harshit Pathak.
For the Opposite Parties : G.A., Saurabh Kumar.

JUDGMENT :

(Anish Kumar Gupta, J.)

1. Heard Sri Anurag Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anil Srivastava, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Saurabh Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and Sri Raj Bahadur Verma, learned AGA for the State.

2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 22.01.2024 passed by the learned Additional Court, Saharanpur in Complaint Case No. 25882 of 2022, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short the 'N.I. Act').

3. The brief facts of the case are that the opposite party no.2 has filed a complaint case under Section 138 of the N.I. Act for dishonour of three cheques bearing cheque no. 418192 dated 28.06.2022, amounting Rs. 5,00,000/-, cheque no. 418193 dated 28.06.2022, amounting Rs. 5,00,000/- and cheque no. 418194 dated 28.06.2022, amounting Rs. 6,72,000/- respectively issued by the applicant herein, which were paid in terms of the sale deed executed by the opposite party no.2 in favour of the applicant herein. The said cheques were presented for encashment and were dishonoured. Thereupon a legal notice dated 19.07.2022 was sent, which was not compli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top