SAURABH LAVANIA
Piyush Singh @ Bobby Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard counsel for the applicant and Sri Nirmal Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. By means of the present application, the applicant has assailed the pending criminal proceedings against him arising out of Case Crime No. 89/2023, under Section 323, 364, 143, 147, 341, 342, 427 IPC, Police Station Hasanganj, District Unnao and summoning order dated 28.06.2023, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 3, Unnao whereby the applicant has been summoned under Section 323, 147, 143 IPC. The relevant portion of the order dated 28.06.2023 reads as under:
3. The applicant has assailed the impugned order on the sole ground that the applicant was not present at the situs/place of crime, as appears from the submissions advanced by the counsel for the applicant, as also from the averments made in Para 12 and 13 of the affidavit filed in support of the application. The same are extracted hereunder:
13. That the Petitioner has also stated his version be
Binay Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar
Chandrika Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar
Dudh Nath Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1981) 2 SCC 166 : 1981 SCC (Cri) 379
Gurcharan Singh v. State of Punjab
Gurpreet Singh v. State of Haryana
Harshendra Kumar D. Vs. Rebatilata Koley and Others
M.N. Ojha Vs. Alok Kumar Srivastava
Mohd. Allauddin Khan Vs. State of Bihar and Others
Rajeev Kourav Vs. Baisahab & Others
R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab
Rajendra Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2007) 7 SCC 378
Shaikh Sattar v. State of Maharashtra
State of Bihar & Anr. Vs. P.P. Sharma & Anr. 1992 Supp1 SCC 222
State of Haryana v. Sher Singh
State of Maharashtra v. Narsingrao Gangaram Pimple
Zandu Pharmaceuticals Works Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Mohammad Shariful Haque & Anr. 2005 (1) SCC 122
The burden of proof for a plea of alibi lies with the accused, who must establish it with absolute certainty after the prosecution proves its case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of electronic evidence in proving the alibi of the accused and the importance of considering the material on record and the invest....
The burden of proof for a plea of alibi lies on the accused, and it is a question of fact required to be proved during the trial.
The burden of proof under Section 106 of the Evidence Act cannot be shifted to accused-appellants who were residing separately from the deceased. Accused must provide a cogent explanation when the in....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.