SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1585

SAURABH LAVANIA
Piyush Singh @ Bobby Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Shailender Singh, Ankit Tiwari, Neelam Singh.

JUDGMENT :

SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

1. Heard counsel for the applicant and Sri Nirmal Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. By means of the present application, the applicant has assailed the pending criminal proceedings against him arising out of Case Crime No. 89/2023, under Section 323, 364, 143, 147, 341, 342, 427 IPC, Police Station Hasanganj, District Unnao and summoning order dated 28.06.2023, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 3, Unnao whereby the applicant has been summoned under Section 323, 147, 143 IPC. The relevant portion of the order dated 28.06.2023 reads as under:

3. The applicant has assailed the impugned order on the sole ground that the applicant was not present at the situs/place of crime, as appears from the submissions advanced by the counsel for the applicant, as also from the averments made in Para 12 and 13 of the affidavit filed in support of the application. The same are extracted hereunder:

    “12. That being a matter of fact the petitioner was not there at point of Offence at Unnao and was there at Lucknow at his Rented Accommodation Near Budheshwar Temple P.S. Para Dist. Lucknow.

    13. That the Petitioner has also stated his version be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top