Vipin Kumar Agrawal vs Manisha Agrawal

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(All) 1780

ARUN BHANSALI, VIKAS BUDHWAR
Vipin Kumar Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Manisha Agrawal – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Archit Mehrotra.
For the Respondent: Harshul Bhatnagar.

JUDGMENT

Arun Bhansali, CJ.

Heard Sri. Manish Goyal, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri. Archit Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri. Ashok Shankar Bhatnagar, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri. Harshul Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 01.09.2017 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Gautambuddha Nagar whereby the petition filed by the appellant under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') seeking dissolution of the marriage has been rejected.

3. The proceedings under Section 13 of the Act were initiated on 03.10.2011 with the averments that parties entered into wedlock on 06.12.1994 and two sons, Vinamra and Chaitanya, were born to them at Farrukhabad District, U.P. At the time of marriage, the family used to reside at Farrukhabad and house of the respondent was at Noida where her family was staying. After the death of respondent's father on 26.11.1999, respondent's both brothers and mother stayed in the house at Noida. Her both the brothers were married, however, their marriages have been dissolved. The respondent was livi