Back
ABDUL MOIN
Subhashini Tomar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Abdul Moin, J.
Heard Sri. Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri. Diwakar Singh, the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, Sri. Ahkilesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent No.3 and 4, Sri. Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5 and Sri. Mrityunjay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.6. Copy on respondent No.2 has not been served on the learned counsel who usually appears for respondent No.2 i.e. Sri. Abhinav Trivedi rather the same has been sent through Registered Post.
2. Instant petition has been filed praying for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to permit the petitioners to appear in supplementary examination for the Third Professional (Phase III) Part II of MBBS Court which is going to commence from 21.06.2024 (erroneously typed as 1st week of June, 2024).
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the respondents are not permitting the petitioners to appear in the said examination on the ground that their attendance is not complete.
4. Sri. Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioners states that a specific averment has b
Attendance requirements for medical examinations must be strictly adhered to, and remedial classes do not retroactively qualify students for supplementary examinations.
Attendance requirements for medical education are stringent and must be upheld to maintain educational standards, despite individual circumstances.
Medical students facing judicial proceedings may be granted exceptions to attendance policies to preserve their academic careers, subject to fulfilling necessary criteria for examinations.
Students failing to meet the attendance criteria cannot be rescued by the court in the absence of any provision for relaxation, as mandated by Ordinance 323 of the University of Rajasthan.
The Court upheld the necessity of minimum attendance requirements for examinations in educational institutions, emphasizing the impact on academic integrity.
The Head of Institution must forward applications for attendance condonation to the Controller of Examinations; summary rejection is unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
