SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2488

ABDUL MOIN
Purnima Mitra Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Indu Prakash Singh, Usha Tripathi.
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's need for child care leave. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding entitlement to leave. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. court’s reliance on regulations, 2018, and precedent. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. grant of leave ordered in favor of petitioner. (Para 15)

JUDGMENT

Abdul Moin, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 1 & 2 and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 3.

2. Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 3 states that as only a short question of law is involved, as such, he does not intend to file any counter affidavit and prays that the matter may be decided on the basis of arguments as advanced. Consequently, the Court proceeds to decide the matter.

3. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for quashing of the order dated 09.06.2023 passed by the respondent no. 3, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition. A further prayer is for a Mandamus commanding the respondents to allow child care leave to the petitioner on account of the ongoing treatment of minor son of the petitioner.

4. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top