SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2523

AJIT KUMAR
Sheshmani Chaubey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shri Prakash Dwivedi.
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

Table of Content
1. basis of dispute over petitioner's date of birth (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments on validity of petitioner's age records (Para 7 , 8)
3. findings from original service book and legal rules (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. court's rationale on third party complaint and service continuity (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. final decision of reinstatement and benefits (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT

Ajit Kumar, J.

Heard Sri Shri Prakash Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner who has been working as a jeep driver was served with a show cause notice dated 14.02.2019 requiring him to show cause as to why an enquiry may not be instituted regarding his date of birth. The basis of the show cause notice was a complaint made by the son of the employee stating therein that his uncle Rajmani Chaubey was five years younger to his father and since his uncle had already retired, how could his father be still in service as he ought to have retired before his uncle.

3. In response to the above show cause notice, petitioner submitted his reply annexing therewith the documentary evidence in the form of motor driving license, adhar card and med

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top