Back
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, VINOD DIWAKAR
Ish Kumar Vlecha – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations against judges and context. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's grievances regarding plot allotment. (Para 2) |
| 3. details of writ petition no. 23656 of 2018. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. criminal contempt proceedings initiated. (Para 4) |
| 5. contempt proceedings connected with current case. (Para 8) |
| 6. petitioner's arguments on procedural impropriety and malpractice. (Para 10 , 14) |
| 7. allegations of fraud and contest over deposited amounts. (Para 18 , 20) |
| 8. court's assessment on eligibility and compliance with auction terms. (Para 21 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. court's decisions based on compliance of auction terms. (Para 31 , 32 , 37) |
| 10. final adjudication and dismissal of the petition. (Para 42 , 47) |
JUDGMENT
Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J.
Facts of this case are unusual and disturbing. Extremely wild and contumacious allegations have been levelled against sitting and retired judges of this Court, by the petitioner in person. Criminal contempt proceedings have also been initiated against the petitioner. In order to appreciate the controversy raised in the matter, it would be apt to refer to the background facts.
2. Petitioner Ish Kumar Valecha is primarily aggrieved by the action of respondent U.P.
A petitioner must meet all procedural requirements for auction participation; failure to comply permits denial of rights, especially within contempt proceedings against defamatory allegations toward ....
Compliance with specific procedural conditions is essential for participation in government auctions, and failure to meet those conditions justifies denial of application.
Unlike a stranger purchaser in a public auction, a co-sharer himself has a pre-existing right in suit schedule property. parties are given an option to go for auction to see that intrinsic value of s....
Mandatory prior approval from the Assistant Collector is essential for land allotments under Section 122-C of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, making unauthorized claims invalid.
Petitioners' failure to disclose material facts and misleading statements led to the dismissal of the writ petition, demonstrating the necessity of 'clean hands' in equitable relief.
Petitioners cannot challenge allotment amounts after acquiescing to the allotment orders and making partial payments, as they were unauthorized occupants without valid claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
