SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2204

DEEPAK VERMA
Sunder Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Sikandar B. Kochar.
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

Table of Content
1. application to quash order on witness summoning (Para 2 , 3)
2. dispute over summoning prosecution witness as defense witness (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's analysis of witness summoning applications (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. limitations on summoning prosecution witnesses (Para 12 , 13)
5. court's dismissal of the application (Para 14)

JUDGMENT

Deepak Verma, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the impugned order dated 15.07.2023 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.5, Varanasi in Session Trial No.399 of 2019 ( State v. Girja Shankar & others) arising out of Case Crime No.722 of 2018, under sections 304B, 498A I.P.C., Police Station Rohaniya, District Varanasi, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.05, Varanasi and direct the learned trial to summon and examine Pradeep Gaur as a defence witness on behalf of the applicant in Session Trial No.399 of 2019 (State v. Girija Shankar and others).

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that FIR was lodged by opposite party no.2 regarding unnatural death at police station Rohaniya, under secti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top