SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2228

GAJENDRA KUMAR
Ajay Garg – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Mohammad Khalid, Zain Abbas
For the Opposite Party : G.A., Jagannath Maurya

JUDGMENT

Gajendra Kumar, J.

Since these applications arise out of same complaint case, they have been heard together and are being decided by a common order. Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. No. 40122 of 2023 is being treated as a leading case.

2. Counter and rejoinder affidavits filed today are taken on record.

3. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State.

4. The present applications have been filed by the applicants with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.31 of 2013, under Sections 43 /44 of Water Pollution (Prevention and Control) Act, 1974, pending in the court of Special Judicial Magistrate, Pollution, Lucknow.

5. The genesis of the present applications arose when the opposite Party no.2 filed criminal complaint against the M/s Teerthanker Mahaveer University and other employees and directors of the same (hereinafter referred as "University"), before the learned Special Judicial Magistrate, Pollution, Lucknow with wholly false, concocted, and frivolous story. The university is a State minority University established by the society Teerthanker Mahaveer Institute of Management and Tec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top