SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2176

JAYANT BANERJI
Sunita – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rahul Kumar Tyagi.
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Sunil Kumar Singh.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks quashing of previous orders. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments regarding applicability of laws. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
3. court clarifies rejection of plaint improper. (Para 11 , 13)
4. definition and relevance of code's commencement. (Para 12)
5. writ petition allowed; orders set aside. (Para 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT

Jayant Banerji, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri O.P. Sharma, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Shri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.5-Gaon Sabha.

2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:-

    "(i) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 17.08.2022 passed by Respondent no. 2 in Second Appeal No. 365 of 2022, Computer case no. ME202211000000365; Smt. Sunita v. State, the Impugned Judgment and order dated 26.11.2021 passed by respondent no. 3 in Appeal No. 02759 of 2018, Computer Case no. C201811000002759; Smt. Sunita v. Gram Sabha and others as well as the impugned judgment and order dated 23.04.2018, passed by Respondent no. 4, in original title No. 06052 of 2017, Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top