SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2308

K. J. THAKER, SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI
State – Appellant
Versus
Pratap Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : A.G.A.
For the Respondent: G.S. Hajela,U.C.Mishra

Table of Content
1. details of the incident and trial process. (Para 4 , 5 , 7)
2. state's argument against the acquittal. (Para 9 , 23)
3. rules governing appeals against acquittals. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. further insights on judicial review in acquittals. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
5. conclusion and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)

JUDGMENT

In compliance of earlier order of this Court, an email from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kannauj has been received to the office mentioning therein that accused-appellant No. 1 Pratap Singh died on 10.3.2017 and accused-appellants No. 2, 3 and 4, namely, Surendra Singh and Lalit Kumar @ Mallu and Mahesh Kumar @ Tillu have been released on bail after furnishing personal bonds and two sureties each.

2. Heard Sri Patanjali Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri G.S. Hajela, learned counsel for accused-respondents No. 2, 3 and 4. This is a Government Appeal of the year 1990 listed time and again.

3. This appeal under Section 378 (3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.'), at the behest of the State, has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 20.12.1989 passed by learned Additio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top