SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2254

RAJAN ROY, MANISH KUMAR
Nitin Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rakshit Raj Singh,Anand Mani Tripathi,S M Singh Royekwar,Suyash Gupta.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Rajan Roy, J.

Heard Shri Anand Mani Tripathi along with Shri S.M. Singh Royekwar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Manish Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.

2. This writ petition was filed on 12.01.2023 seeking the following relief:-

    "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Commissioner of Police (opposite party No.3) to restore the security cover which was provided to the petitioner by the Government of Uttar Pradesh vide letter dated 11.08.2022 (as contained in Annexure No. 1)."

3. The facts of the case in brief are that the petitioner is a Contractor in a Construction Company and has been so for quite sometime, at least since 2011, although, the Company has changed from time to time. He was granted security cover under the interim order dated 15.11.2011 of this Court passed in an earlier writ petition filed by him bearing Writ Petition No. 10096 (M/B) of 2011; Nitin Singh v. State of U.P. and Ors. The said writ petition was decided on 31.07.2019. On a perusal of the said judgement shows that after passing of the interim order dated 15.11.2011, security was granted to him, but, inspite of the or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top