SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2800

RAJEEV MISRA
Aarti Industries – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Rajeev Misra, J.

Heard Mr. Sagir Ahmad, the learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Syed Irfan Ali, the learned counsel for applicant, the learned A.G.A. for State and Mr. Gaurav Kakkar, the learned counsel representing first informant/opposite party-2.

2. Perused the record.

3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed challenging the Summoning Order dated 22.11.2021 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khurja, Bulandshahar, in Complaint Case No. 701 of 2021 (M/s Naresh Potteries v. M/s Aarti Industries) under Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station-Kotwali Khurja Nagar, District-Bulandshahar, as well as the entire proceedings of aforementioned complaint case, now pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khurja, Bulandshahar.

4. Record shows that applicant gave a cheque dated 10.07.2021 bearing no. 086295 valued at Rs. 1,70,46,314/- drawn on Central Bank of India, Khurja Branch, Khurja. Aforesaid cheque was presented by the complainant-opposite party 2 in his bank namely HDFC Bank, Khurja on 12.07.2021. However, the same was returned unencashed, vide return memo dated 13.07.2021 with the remark "insufficient funds". In view of ab

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top