SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1935

SAURABH LAVANIA
Akram Alias Janib – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Dinesh Kumar Misra, Divyanshu Mishra
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Saurabh Lavania, J.

Heard Sri. Divyanshu Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the State.

2. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. It is for the reasons that no prejudice would be caused to them and even after appearance they would not be in a position to dispute factual aspect of the case and the process would delay the disposal of cases in issue as also the present petition.

3. Present petition has been filed for the following main relief:-

    "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 2.1.2024 passed by the Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow in Revision No. 3657 of 2023/Bijnore (Computerized Case No. R20231316003657) "Akram alias Janib v. Mohammad Kasim" Under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as well as the impugned order dated 30.10.2023 passed by the Up Zila Adhikari, Dhampur, District-Bijnore in Case No. 254 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. T202313160300254) "Akram alias Janib Mohammad v. Smt. Rajiya and others" Under Section 225 (Cha) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top