SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1751

SHEKHAR B. SARAF
Jai Prakash Shiv Charan Bidi – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Commercial Taxes – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Pooja Talwar.
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Shekhar B. Saraf, J.

Heard Mrs. Pooja Talwar, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri. Rishi Kumar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State/respondents.

2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated December 6, 2021 passed by the respondent no.2 under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 alongwith the State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and the order in appeal dated August 25, 2022 passed by Additional Commissioner, Grade-2(Appeal)-I State Tax, Jhansi, rejecting the first appeal of the petitioner on the ground that the certified copy of the order passed under Section 74 of the Act was not annexed to the appeal.

3. Upon a perusal of the appellate order, I am of the view that the technical ground on which the appellate authority has rejected the first appeal of the petitioner should not be allowed to stand.

4. In light of the same, the impugned order dated August 25, 2022 passed by the appellate authority is quashed and set aside with a direction upon the appellate authority to hear out the first ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top