Raghvendra vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 2685

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2685

SIDDHARTH
Raghvendra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Brij Raj, Abhishek Srivastava, Krishna Kumar, Kuldeep Singh Yadav, Satendra Singh, Sr. Advocate.
For the Respondent: G.A., Hare Krishna Mishra, Jitendra Kumar, Purushottam Dixit, Saima Saher.

Table of Content
1. application for bail based on facts of the case. (Para 2 , 4)
2. arguments regarding procedural requirements for bail appeals. (Para 5 , 6)
3. analysis of legal framework governing bail appeals. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. definition of appeal distinguished from application. (Para 16)
5. court's conclusion on meritorious considerations for bail. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
6. conditions upon granting bail and consequences of breach. (Para 21 , 22)
7. final ruling and appreciation of counsel assistance. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)

JUDGMENT

Siddharth, J.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant; learned AG A for opposite party no. 1; Ms. Saima Saher, learned counsel for informant and perused the material placed on record.

2. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed by the appellant to set aside the impugned order dated 30.06.2022, whereby the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Etawah, has rejected the bail application of the appellant moved by him in Case Crime No. 0088 of 2021, under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 307 and 302 IPC and section 3(2) (V) of SC/ST Act, Police S