Raghvendra vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 2685

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2685

SIDDHARTH
Raghvendra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Brij Raj, Abhishek Srivastava, Krishna Kumar, Kuldeep Singh Yadav, Satendra Singh, Sr. Advocate.
For the Respondent: G.A., Hare Krishna Mishra, Jitendra Kumar, Purushottam Dixit, Saima Saher.

JUDGMENT

Siddharth, J.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant; learned AG A for opposite party no. 1; Ms. Saima Saher, learned counsel for informant and perused the material placed on record.

2. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed by the appellant to set aside the impugned order dated 30.06.2022, whereby the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Etawah, has rejected the bail application of the appellant moved by him in Case Crime No. 0088 of 2021, under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 307 and 302 IPC and section 3(2) (V) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Saifai, District Etawah. 3. This is the second criminal appeal of the appellant filed against bail rejection order dated 30.06.2022 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Court No. 2, Etawah, rejecting the bail application of the appellant in S.T. No. 766/2021, Case Crime No. 0088 of 2021.

4. Prayer has been made for setting aside the aforesaid order passed by the court below and allowing this appeal along with the bail application filed therewith for enlarging the appellant on bail during the pendency of trial.

5. Learned Additional Advocate Gener