SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2067

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Piyush Agrawal, J.
Sahas Degree College – Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and Others – Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition Nos. 41137, 41138, 41854 of 2010
Decided On : 08-08-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Ankit Kumar Rai, K.M. Misra

Oral gifts under Muslim law do not require registration, and proceedings under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act cannot be initiated for unregistered documents.

Headnote:(A) Indian Stamp Act, 1882 - Section 2(14-A) and Section 47-A - Transfer of Property Act - Section 129 - Muslim Personal Law - Validity of oral gifts - The court held that oral gifts under Muslim law do not require registration and that proceedings under Section 47-A cannot be initiated for unregistered documents. (Paras 11-14)

(B) Legal requirements for gifts - The essentials for a valid gift under Muslim law include declaration, acceptance, and delivery of possession, with no requirement for a written document. (Paras 27-31)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the imposition of stamp duty and penalty on an oral gift of land made under Muslim Personal Law, asserting that the gift did not require registration.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the impugned orders were unsustainable as the gift was not presented for registration, thus quashing the orders.

Issues: The main issues were whether the oral gift required registration and the applicability of Section 47-A of the Stamp Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that oral gifts under Muslim law are valid without registration, and proceedings under Section 47-A are not applicable to unregistered documents.

Result: Writ petitions allowed.

JUDGMENT :

Piyush Agrawal, J.

1. Heard Sri Atul Dayal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Ankit Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. Since the similar controversy involved in the aforesaid writ petitions, all the writ petitions are being decided by this common order.

3. For convenience, the facts of Writ-C No. 41137 of 2010 is being delineated here.

4. By means of instant writ petition, the following prayer has been made:

    “(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the records of the case and quash the impugned order dated 27.9.2008 (Annexure 3) to this writ petition) passed by the respondent No. 3 as well as the Appellate Order dated 1.6.2010 (Annexure 5 to this writ petition) passed by the respondent No. 2.

    (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus declaring Section 2(14-A) inserted in the Indian Stamp Act, 1882 by means of U.P. Act No. 38 of 2001 as unconstitutional, void, inoperative and ultra vires being repugnant to the provisions of two Central enactments namely Transfer of Property Act as well as Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 (Act No. 26 of 1937).

    (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus restraining the respondent from making recovery of the amount in question from the petitioner pursuant to the impugned order dated 27.9.2008 (Annexure 3 to this writ petition) passed by the respondent No. 3 as well as the Appellate Order dated 1.6.2010 (Annexure 5 to this writ petition) passed by the respondent No. 2.

    (iv)..........

    (v)..........”

5. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that Ale Hasan made an oral gift in respect of his Bhumidhari land in Khata No. 76, Khasra Nos. 602/3 and 605/2, total area 1.250 Hectare situate in Village Bilana, Tehsil Amroha, District J.P. Nagar in favour of Sarvari Educational Society on 22.12.2005, which was accepted and possession was handed over to the Society. A memorandum was also drawn on the same date. Further, Mohd. Aslam, in the capacity of Manager, of the Sarvari Educational Society made an oral gift in favour of Sahas Degree College, which stood accepted through its Secretary namely Nadeem Hasan S/o Ale Hasan on 6.2.2006 and memorandum in the form of Yaddast was written on 28.2.2006. All the gifts were oral as per the Muslim Personal Law, which has been accepted. Thereafter, on the basis of an ex-parte report, proceedings under Section 47-A of the Stamp Act were initiated to which the petitioner submitted his reply, but not being satisfied from the same, an order dated 27.9.2008 was passed, determining the deficiency stamp duty, amounting to Rs. 11,25,000/- as well as equal amount of penalty has been imposed, against which an appeal was preferred, which also met the same fate.

6. Senior Counsel further submits that the hiba/gift was made, which was only written for yaddast, but the same was not registered as the same was not required to be registered, still the proceedings under Section 47-A of the Stamp Act have wrongly been initiated against the petitioner.

7. He submits that the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hafeeza Bibi and others v. Shaikh Farid (Dead) by LRs. and others, 2011 (2) ARC 218, has held that there is no requirement for getting it registered under the Registration Act.

8. He further submits that no proceedings under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act can be initiated, hence the proceedings are bad.

9. Per contra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel supports the impugned orders.

10. After hearing the parties, the Court has perused the record.

11. It is not in dispute that the hiba/gift was made orally and the doner made the declaration of hiba, which was accepted as gift by the donee and the possession was delivered under the Muslim Personal Law to which there is no requirement of getting in writing, Further, it is not required to be registered as held by the Hon'ble Apex Cour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top