SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2080

ALOK MATHUR
Sandhya Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A.K.Srivastava
For the Respondent: Sanjai Singh

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Alok Mathur, J.-Heard Sri A.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri J.S. Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sanjai Singh, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

2. In the light of proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.

3. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has approached this Court challenging notice dated 1.8.2024, which has been issued in pursuance to order dated 30.7.2024, passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Allahabad whereby he has been impleaded in the proceedings pending before the Tribunal.

4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as ''the Act, 2002''), initiated by the respondent-Bank against borrower namely respondent No. 3 as well as guarantor respondent No. 4 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as ''the Tribunal'') under the Act, 2002. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 moved securitisation application before the Tribunal assailing the proceedings under Section 13(2) and 13(4) of the Act,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top